“Shaming the Constitution: The Detrimental Results of Sexual Violent Predator Legislation” (Book)

The title of this post is the title of this notable new book authored by Michael Perlin and Heather Ellis Cucolo which provides a fitting follow-up to prior posts in this space this week concerning problems with sex offender recidivism data and expanding use of crime registries. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Yea they use all of this data to hand out presumptively and predetermined mental health diagnosis without even actually giving you a lawful mental health or medical disorder. They just say you are violent, dangerous, and relativistic, and a threat to the public safety. They don’t even tell you that they are giving you a mental health diagnosis, lol. Boy these guys are clever and dangerous to this country since they can illegally give you a mental health status and condition and just call it registration. This country is totally lost, and no one even raises this issue.
So you get a conditional release with custody and control, supervision, management, and guardianship by all of those persons involved and it’s attached to your conviction. But they claim its not civil or criminal double jeopardy or illegal deprivation of procedural and substantive rights even when they give you a mental health diagnosis, illegally.
What a legal system we have, a utter joke.

Uh, Tom, did you even READ the summary of the book?

The book is more on our side than those knee jerk reactions you talked about, and seems to detail exactly why those reactions are incorrect.

That makes sense as one of the authors is an attorney with a background in criminal defense, as it relates to mental disabilities and is a professor at New York Law. Those are the kind of chops that are needed in our struggle.

I think the idea that it’s a punishment has run its course. But if you use the regulatory law aspect you can get somewhere. You segmental health laws are regulatory and they provide a lot of procedural and substantive due process. And since the entire basis of soras is a mental health status and condition that you will offend, they have to prove it with a jury trial, a probable cause hearing, psychiatrists and mental health testimony and evidence.
Just take a look at your state mental health processes and procedures, they will tell you that first and foremost you must get treatment, and confidentiality, and a whole slew of protections your not getting through the automatic and mandatory and predetermined illegal mental health diagnosis you have been placed under their custody and control through.
Yup they were really slick, but the jig is up. You have all been illegally diagnosed as nuts, and they have given you a conditional release they just call registration. It’s just a substitute for a mental health law.
It will never be called a punishment but it certainly can be called a mental health law, and one that is illegal as can be, lol.

Just started reading this book and it is fascinating.!
Didn’t know that J Edgar Hoover’s concern that “we don’t let wild animals roam the streets so we shouldn’t let SO’s roam the streets either” was a major factor in the screwed up registry that we now have. (He had a few of his own skeletons in his closet if I’m not mistaken.)
Hope the courts and justices start using this “new and improved” fact filled info when deciding about people’s lives rather than old, out-dated, inaccurate magazine articles.