ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459
Date: Sept 26, Time: 5 pm PT – New Tiered Registry Law

Monthly Meetings

Q4: 10/14 in Los Angeles

General News

Airbnb uses background checks to weed out sex offenders

… With so many guests coming in and out of neighborhoods there are concerns about criminals, including sex offenders renting homes next to families who do not know the sex offender is there.

Tennessee law requires sex offenders to register with the Davidson County Sheriff’s Office within 48 hours of “establishing a physical presence at a particular location.” If that person is only in town for 24 hours, they could fly under the radar. Full Article

Join the discussion

  1. AlexO

    Even though this is not a law, the fact that more and more private companies are discriminating against RC’s puts more and more holes in the 2003 ruling that “there’s no evidence that RC’s have more difficulties living than any other citizen would otherwise”. All these things should and will be considered next time things roll back around to SCOTUS.

  2. JB

    “News 2 checked with Airbnb to find out what their website does to insure sex offenders are not booking rooms and homes.”

    The sky is falling!!! Someone who committed a crime years ago, and in my case, there was no victim, can not rent a room or home, even if I am with another adult. lol… Oh my God, the 19 yr old who had sex with his 16 yr girlfriend and caught got (20 years ago) – we can’t rent a room or home to this hypothetical person.

    To be on the safe side, whenever I stay at a hotel or motel, I usually book the room under the name of who I am traveling with, whether it be my dad, girlfriend, etc… and I do not stay at places that are not a hotel or motel.

    I am afraid we will never change public perception. And unless we are a protected class, which I never see happening, then I guess we have no legal standing to sue for discrimination.

    • Chris F

      Our legal standing to sue isn’t at the individual businesses or people, but to sue our own government. The businesses have a right to protect their clients from anything that could be harmful, and could theoretically be sued for negligence if they let something bad happen that could be prevented.

      Our own government is at fault for creating this “scarlet letter” list disguised as just valid public record. Though initially found constitutional for not being anything but a public record, it has morphed a thousand times over into being used as a list of people that MUST be assumed dangerous. Hence, the governments own laws preventing government housing assistance, and the EEOC saying it is ok for business hiring decisions to discriminate based on the list separate from the criminal background checks that should only go back 7 years for any other former criminal.

      If it is now a list of people considered “dangerous” then it has to be narrowly tailored to include only individuals that can realistically be said to be currently dangerous and have had proper Substantive Due Process protections to be heard and represented fairly before a judge with restrictions tailored to that individual and the circumstances. That hasn’t happened, and that is what must be challenged.

      No list for any crime should exist, and no laws against those convicted of a past crime should be constitutional. It is the Judiciaries job to punish and protect the public during the fair sentencing phase where both sides can be heard. It is not the job of the legislature. The legislature creates laws pertaining to protecting the public in all other cases, but should only be providing guidelines and tools to judges to allow them to do their job and not interfere with it.

    • But it is only regulatory

      Best Value Inn does the same thing and they are a major hotel chain. I agree the argument that registry is punishment and is beyond regulatory is mounting. How is it regulatory for hotels, etc to deny services to those who have completed their time, etc? I don’t see it.

  3. Bruce Ferrell

    The article is about Tennessee, but I’m going to presume Airbnb uses uniform policies in every state.

    If so, in because the 290 statute says that registration information may not be used to deny housing (is lodging the same as housing?), it SEEMS to me that this policy is in direct conflict with California statute law.

    But maybe I’m wrong.

    • pgm111

      Excellent point and just cause for a lawsuit. Janice?

      • HOOKSCAR

        This is one thing that I do not understand. 🤔 Why is it only Frank gets all the fun? I want to be listed as a Doe, but I will use my real name also. I have all the time in the world. Disabled, so I don’t work. Live in San Diego.
        On another note. Senator Joel Anderson is having a town hall meeting, Community Coffee, on the 25th of July. A Tuesday at 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm.
        VFW Post 5867
        1250 Lindo Lane
        Lakeside, Ca. 92040
        Who drinks coffee at that late an hour? Lol.
        I have issues with a few property issues as a culvert and brow ditch are on my property.
        I am also curious as to his position on SB 421. Anyone else care to join me?

    • AJ

      There may well be a case for those in CA. Synonyms for lodging: apartment, hostel, hotel, inn, lodge, motel, resort, shelter abode, address, camp, castle, chambers, cover, domicile, dorm, dwelling, habitation, harbor, home. lodgment, palace, place, port, protection, quarters, residence, roof, room, bed and breakfast, boarding house, pied-à-terre, room and board, rooming house. (http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/lodging).

  4. David

    For two years, I was an active member of AirBnB, booking rental stays in U.S. and European cities, before AirBnB sent me an email cancelling my membership. *Annoyed* 😡

  5. Clifford Ray Irby II

    They rent rooms to murders, r they not considered dangerous? Yet there r no restrictions r registry for them so why is it for sex offenders? What about armed robbers? Kidnappers? Only sex offenders r dangerous?!?

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum. Feel free to leave your contact info here.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *