ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings
Q4: [details]

Other Events
ACSOL Conference: June 15/16, 2018 in Los Angeles [details]

Meetings

ACSOL’s First Phone Meeting is August 12 [updated with recording]

Please join me and attorney Chance Oberstein for our very first telephone version of the live monthly meetings we have in various cities around California.

The conference call will be on Saturday, August 12 at 10 am Pacific Time (1:00 Eastern) and will last from 2 to 3 hours.

This is separate from the topic conference calls, which we will still have. We are doing this in the hope that far more registrants–including those outside California–will attend.

Topics of conversation include information about ACSOL’s advocacy as well as current topics and pending legal action.

Please Show up, Stand up, and Speak up!

Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055
Conference Code: 983459

This will be recorded and available on our website www.all4consolaws.org

I look forward to having you call in.

Sincerely,

Janice

Recording

 

Join the discussion

  1. Lake County

    I hope to participate, looking forward to it.

  2. Chris F

    I’ll be on vacation with the family, so no way I can call in though I’d really like to.

    If anyone else could bring up a topic, I would like to know the lawyers’ thoughts on a challenge to freedom of speech based on Packingham to how the government provides our email addresses to social networks just so they can ban us. Just like IML providing our info to other countries that just ban us, this should also be a violation of Substantive Due Process.

    After all, in both situations the judiciary is not declaring we are too dangerous to travel to other countries or use social networking during the fair sentencing portion of the trial, which is when the judiciary has the task assigned ONLY to them to punish, rehabilitate, and PROTECT THE PUBLIC from those convicted. NOT the legislature.

    In both situations, another government or a social networking site isn’t going to spend the time, money, and resources to determine our level of dangerousness every time, when our own government didn’t do it just ONE time during trial. They have no reasonable alternative but to ban us all based on the lowest common denominator of a repeat child predator being somewhere on our “list”.

    Packingham was really big for us, and should translate into arguments to affect all this. Between the Justices specifically noting the “troubling” way restrictions go on past the end of the length of supervision determined by the judiciary and therefore over-ridden by legislature with sex offender laws, and how they recognized the extreme importance of social media to those trying to re-integrate with society, I think we have a solid foundation to build on.

    If anyone could get their opinions on this, it would be greatly appreciated.

  3. Matthew

    Kind of scary that they are looking into ammend CP. Its not something I am proud of but was able to determine my shortcomings and reasons behind it. I hope it sticks to tier 1.

  4. TG

    Does anyone know when SB 421 will be heard?

  5. Josh james

    Listened to the call. All the way from Missouri. Thanks for speaking up. I have written my statesman and govenor. I hope it makes a difference.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *