Are sex offender registries reinforcing inequality?

Public sex offender registries are at the forefront of what I’ve described in my research as a “war on sex.”

Offenders convicted of sex crimes are now singled out for surveillance and restrictions far more punitive than those who commit other types of crime. More than 800,000 Americans are now registered sex offenders. Tracking them has created a booming surveillance industry. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

12 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Of course sex offender registries reinforce inequality across the social and racial spectrum.

Yes it’s reinforcing inequality, registrants are getting rigged in the system as a form of punishment after they’ve already been punished, and they’re getting harassed and humiliated by the public because of what they’ve done, and be exposed in the media to create hysteria. This is just like the “war on drugs” epidemic except this is “war on sex” that feeds to mass incarceration. Our politicians have played the world’s greatest Jedi mind trick on us about how dangerous, evil, and incurable registrants are because of recidivism through propaganda.

That’s easy: yes. Next question. Digging deeper, I think the easiest way to attack residency and presence restrictions is to compare recidivism in States (or counties or cities) that have them to States (etc.) that do not. Boom, done. No need for any deeper studies or panels or grants. The data are right there waiting to be used.

Retroactive registration for sex offenders before the enactment was past are unconstitutional and the U.S. Supreme Court should rule in favor of our constitutional rights. The retroactive laws are not regulatory but are absolutely punitive in nature.

GT

The fact the laws are mirrored after how Germany treated the Jews (minus the gas chambers) shows it is indeed punishment and reinforcing inequality. Besides being like Nazi Germany, its also pretty close to the old Jim Crow laws. You can call it Jim Crow 2.0.

I completed a sex offender treatment program, and the overarching emphasis was that having a healthy social life was the key ingredient to not reoffending. So I have finally found a girlfriend, things are going very well, she wants me to stay the night at her house (how wonderful), I call the police department to be sure every thing is cool–but everything is not cool, they say I have to register her address with them–so I ask, “Will her address come up on the public registry?” The answer is yes! “But she has rental properties, and that could seriously hamper people wanting to rent their.” “To bad!”. So I am not able to have a normal relationship with a woman–the single thing the SO therapist said was crucial to success is stifled by the registry. Yes, I would say it reinforces inequality.