ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459, Time: 5 pm PT

Monthly Meetings

Q3: 9/16 in San Diego [details], Q4: 10/14 in Los Angeles

Emotional Support Group Meeting: Aug 26 in LA [details]

ACSOLCalifornia

San Diego Sex Offender Residency Law Faces Uphill Legal Battle

[KPBS]

An attorney filed a lawsuit in federal court on Monday challenging a San Diego law that restricts where registered sex offenders can live. The City Attorney’s Office may now face the difficult task of fighting a legal battle it is not confident it can win.

San Diego’s “Child Protection Act,” passed by the City Council in 2008, bars registered sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of minor-oriented facilities, including arcades, schools, parks and libraries. The law has not been enforced since 2009 because of concerns over its legality.

 

Read more

 

Join the discussion

  1. Joe123

    We’re with you Janice! Thank you for doing the right thing. These council members that voted against the repeal already look like idiots claiming that these laws protect children when they should be looking within their own family circles to find sexual abuse going on. Mis-guided morons, who are going to cost San Diego tens of thousands and hopefully hundreds of thousands of dollars. Hope they learn their lesson.

  2. David

    Good article that clearly states all the reasons the law should have been repealed. And it has good links/downloads including to the lawsuit filing itself (with Janice’s name right up top!)

    (Thank you, ACSOL and Janice, for bringing a big smile to my face!)

  3. Jack

    Can’t say I’m surprised. The city council in San Diego sounds like a bunch of Nazi thugs to me. They’ll never change. Real Nazis like these just need to be stopped.

  4. Q

    City Attorney Mara Elliott must be a very frustrated attorney having to work with a group that can only be described as ignoramuses.

  5. DavidH

    By Golly! Do I read this lawsuit right??? Are we actually suing for damages the “Defendants” in this case the city council members who voted against repeal and some other unknown 1-10 defendants personally, as opposed to seeking attorney fees and other financial compensation from the city???

    This has been my dream come true. To make the bastards who do these things personally liable! Only then can we give them pause to think about the consequences!

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum. Feel free to leave your contact info here.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *