ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings
Q4: [details]

Other Events
ACSOL Conference: June 15/16, 2018 in Los Angeles [details]

National

CO: Town of Palisade lowers fee sex offenders are required to pay to register

[thedenverchannel.com]

PALISADE, Colo. – In a move designed to encourage compliance from offenders, the town of Palisade has lowered the fees associated with registering as a sex offender.

The decision to lower the fee from $75 a year to $25 a year was made earlier this month by the Board of Trustees, Denver7 news partner KJCT reported.

The Palisade Police Department asked the board to lower the fee on behalf of offenders, who may be dissuaded to register because of the financial burden.

The reduction of fees is not expected to have much of a financial impact on the Mesa County town because of its relatively low number of registered offenders.

Registration can become very expensive for Colorado offenders. The fee in Denver is $75 for the initial registration and an additional $25 each time an offender is required to register annually or quarterly.

Read the article

 

Join the discussion

  1. Gralphr

    Its beyond me why people have to pay anything in the first place. Its pretty much extortion in that they’re making you pay for something or face a punishment. Never-mind people who have to register for life. You’re basically telling them they must pay the government a fee for the rest of their life for breaking the law. Does any other crime carry such a burden?

    • It doesn’t work

      Hey Gralphr, the registry is not a burden. Ask any politician or procecutor or Laura Ahearn. Judges on the other hand, are realizing…

    • JoeBlo

      Agreed. Too far NO Offender done with Par/Prob. Should have to pay anything for register. PERIOD. Suing the County could be the only way out.

  2. Cool RC CA

    Let’s save MORE money. Just get rid of whole registry thing.

  3. Tim L

    An article of this nature reminds me that the SORs are unconstitutional on many levels. Of particular our constitution only provides for two levels of government in the American system. Federal and state government are the only two provided by that document. That the Whetterling act ( 94OMNIBUS) recognised a third, local jurisdiction clearly falls outside that constitutional limitation and provides reason enough to not permit it. This too is an example of ever expanding levels of government expansion which usually tend to restrict liberty.

  4. JB

    You pay a “fee” for a service. This is a fine, plain and simple!

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *