General Comments December 2017

Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of December 2017. Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil.

Related posts

460 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Annual today.

We had to sign a form acknowledging new laws. On the sheet, number 1 was that we must give the state 21 days advanced notice before Out of State or International Travel. I also had to give a new DNA sample.

I had not been in this forum for awhile, I am one of the lucky perverts that has a job and I am usually exhausted or asleep, so I have not been active.

I signed it because I am a good little drone, but I DID question the officer about the out of state part. She said as far as she knew it was only International. I asked then why out of state is on the form, without a parole or probation comment, that all perverts must give 21 days for out of state travel. She did not know why it was there, that it must be the law now.

This is Riverside County.

I apologize if this has been discussed, but I did not want to read through all 344 comments in this section to see if this has been previously discussed.

21 days for out of state travel? As someone who’s entire family lives out of CA, I am wondering how I can possibly make attendance for funerals.

When I was on probation, I had to travel to Atlanta for work several times a year. All I did was tell my PO and I was able to go.

I am really starting to wonder what is the point of staying alive anymore? I cannot really think of any reason not to blow myself up in Sacramento other than the pain that will be felt by my friends and family. The only reason not to Steven Paddock is because it will hurt other people. I have hurt enough people, but I am just getting weary of all this.

Something must be said, and like I always say, “If you are not willing to kill or die to be heard, your voice is but a whisper.”

This is typical registration day depression and by mid Jan I will be okay again.

One of the perverts with me was asking about going to Canada on an upcoming cruise he had purchased. It was not my conversation so I kept quiet, but I wanted to tell him to get a refund. The registering officer did know that cruise lines and airlines check their manifest against the registry, which was refreshing, usually those folks know less about the laws than we do.

The out of state thing surprised me. Is there a way to upload pics so you folks can see the form?

Stay strong Renny, times are changing and something is going to happen one way or the other. Either our constitutional republic is coming to an end or the founding fathers visions will live on. Sex offender registration is going to be the deciding factor. Either way it is coming to a head…..AJ,Chris< New Person and anyone else commenting or collaboration with me, no more posting large legal jargon like I always post, lets use the gofile site like AJ uses so as not to clog up the general comments sections. I know it is usually me so I will keep it down to just references. Mikeys20122012@yahoo.com if any one wishes to contact me personally…Thanks…

AJ, in your markup where you state (alterations added) am I supposed to include that phrase in my motion????

The AWA was enacted after I was sentenced, I wonder how that effects the Ex Post Facto issue in my case…..

New Person, I love your updated argument for Involuntary servitude. It is perfect……

Another way the federal government wastes time and money:

Having someone take a sexual history polygraph when the individual has no sexual, dating, or relationship experience.

Email me New Person, I need your assistance with the Involuntary Servitude and I appreciate your take on the issues. It takes a wide array of perceptions and ideas to make this happen…..I am about done posting about it on here as there is very little feedback from anyone but you three. And I do not want to state everything on an open form or clog up the comments on ACSOL site. Hit me up man. Mikeys20122012@yahoo.com

Wow, I just now read that Co case…That is eerily similar to my case only with less of a record and way less attributable harm shown. almost all their claims for harm was anecdotal and unconfirmed but was still weighing heavy in their favor. I also have four eyewitness accounts of harassment that is directly attributable to my Megan’s Law profile and in fact the perpetrators were actually yelling at the top of their lungs in my Apt. parking that “you are on Megan’s man” “you must be a child molester and a pervert since your on Megan’s Law” in another eyewitness account the individual was standing outside his new apt. across from me yelling ” there better not be any 290s in here” and ” I better not find anyone in here on Megan’s Law” and a few days later he was yelling at me calling me a “weirdo” and “pervert” before he eventually moved out after my on-grounds property manager confronted him and warned him against taking any adverse actions against me. Also..For example, in 2010 I was offered employment with an Electrical contractor but I did not accept employment since I was fully aware the position required frequent and extensive travel, both interstate and intrastate. Again in 2012 I was offered a position by a close friend as a Forman for a general contractor which I again had to reject because of the extensive travel that position entailed. These instances may appear to be anecdotal based solely on personal accounts without confirmation but it is supported by common knowledge that these types of positions require extensive travel and frequent entry into these safety zones. The fact that these individual employers do not want to get involved in my case, and the fact that I do not want to put these professionals in any precarious position by requiring them to participate, does not negate the fact that I am an eye-witness with firsthand knowledge that these events occurred and I am willing to testify under oath of such events.
Plaintiff was also laid off from his most recent employment in 2015 because of his exposure from the Megan’s Law Website when one of his colleagues at work discovered he was on said Website. The word was spread to other employees who eventually shunned and harassed Plaintiff to the point that the stress was overwhelming causing Plaintiff extreme chronic health issues. Once his employer caught wind of his inclusion on the Website he was mysteriously laid off for a “lack of work” while all others were continuing to be employed. After asking why he was being discharged and if it had anything to do with his sex offender registration status the employer denied even being aware of plaintiff’s status. The disclaimer on the Megan’s Law Website specifically prohibits an employer for retaliation or discharge for an ex-offender’s information being included on said Website so of course any employer will deny any knowledge of that information or that it was in any way a cause of action to prevent litigation or culpability under the law. Plaintiff is subject to lifetime registration that is accessible to potential employers for the remainder of Plaintiff’s life, unlike similarly situated citizens (i.e. felons) who are only subject to a seven year background check; Ca Civil Code Section 1786.18 precludes an investigative consumer reporting agency from containing convictions that are more than seven years old.
Fortunately, Plaintiff’s sex offender status has not been discovered by his fellow students at the community college that he attends as of yet or the ostracism that Plaintiff will undoubtedly endure will be fatal to his desired goals of achieving a higher education as well as placing impenetrable barriers that plaintiff will face when applying or attempting to enter into a professional career. This imminent harm is real and predictable and unless the court acts Plaintiff will undoubtedly suffer irreparable harm from the consequences of being subject to sex offender registration and having his personal information on a publically accessible Megan’s Law Website as well as private website such as Homefacts.com and Mugshots.com.

Love it AJ…I had to post this for all to see what I wrote and how it totally relates…….
Although it was decided on different issues the case in Vlandis v. Kline 412 U.S. 441 (1973) is apropos of this case since it appears the states seem to believe, erroneously, they have a right to make a permanent irreversible and irrebuttable presumption concerning recidivism rates and future dangerousness. The Supreme Court held that permanent irrebuttable presumptions are constitutionally disfavored, because they deny due process. Id. at 446. In Vlandis the Court concluded by saying that “standards of due process require that the State allow such an individual the opportunity to present evidence showing that he is a bona fide resident entitled to the in-state rates.” (parenthesis added). Id. at 452.

Here is an article with detailed arguments why ” irrebuttable presumption” is a hard one to convince SCOTUS to accept with more than ‘rational basis” applied and therefore likely to fail:

https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2578&context=law_lawreview

It does leave room for Strict Scrutiny review if either a fundamental right or suspect classifications are present. I think we have enough fundamental rights affected, and the fact that we are a hated and politically powerless class should also help clear these hurdles outlined in this article.

Extraordinary, isn’t it? Well, no; it’s become rather typical now. More puritanical than the Puritans, that’s what our culture has become. Puritan, except in matters involving oneself.

Page 102: the Fontana Police Department claims that SO’s have the lowest rehabilitation rate, and that more than 90% will continue to reoffend.

http://cms.sbcounty.gov/Portals/27/2014-15-Reports.pdf

They seriously believe their own BS! Even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, this is a statement of fact included on a Grand Jury report! They should have their asses sued for defamation, or whatever the hell it is they can sued for.

I need a bunch more of these statements for any type of legislation or relevent public policy like this with citation….>>>>>Report to Grand Jury: 2014-2015 San Bernardino County Grand Jury – Registered Sex Offender Websites
Fontana Police Department: Sex offenders have the lowest rehabilitation rates according to the Fontana Police Department representatives and approximately 90% of sex offenders will continue to re-offend. http://cms.sbcounty.gov/Portals/27/2014-15-Reports.pdf [p,102 para 3]visited on December 31, 2107)

I will be able to apply for a COR in 2018. I am not currently on the public website, and I have been fortunate enough to land an excellent job. I was not planning to apply for a COR because of my current, positive, employment status. But since the California legislature just torpedoed me with the “super-fantastic” tiered registry scam, I intend to attempt a COR in 2018 so that I can try to get off the registry before what’s left of my life gets destroyed in 2021. The question: Can anybody who has applied for a COR tell me what, specifically, to expect from the Nazi’s when they do their investigation, relative to a COR application? I have read all of the information in the “living with 290” section of this website. But there is very little information about what happens during the application/investigation process. I have heard that the DA investigators show up at the place of employment and try their best to get the person applying for a COR fired. I don’t know if that’s true, or if it’s fear-mongering. Any specific information that anybody can offer would be very helpful. My case was settled in 2008. The offense was very low level and I have never been on the public website. That said, my case was high-profile because of who I was in the community; not what I did. Knowing that, I expect the DA to do the same thing upon application for a COR that they did during the investigation and eventual prosection. I know and understand the laws. I have done all the leg work to get ready to apply on the day I am allowed. What I need to know is what to expect from the Nazi’s when they show up at my job. Will they talk to the owner? The HR person? Anybody they want? How hard will they try to smash my reputation with my coworkers? Thank you in advance for any guidance you can offer.

Hey New Person, or anyone else for that matter, you may want to go to my site http://mllkeys20112011.wixsite.com/mysite and check out my final revision of the Opposition to the AG’s Motion. In particular, New Person should read the Involuntary Servitude section at the end. I think with your help we nailed that as well.

Does anyone have details of when the Tiered Registry goes into effect – specifically when all offender profiles will become public? I would like to be prepared for the repercussions of my new notoriety at work and in my community.

🤔 Thanks. A lot can happen in three year’s time – especially as we continue to see courts rule SORs punitive and, therefore, unConstitutional.

So, if we are EXCLUDED NOW from the megans law website, we will stay off until January 2021 or 2022???

Man I just don’t get it….Why would you wait to petition the court just because they say you have too?
“In the United States the right to petition is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which specifically prohibits Congress from abridging “the right of the people…to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”.
Although often overlooked in favor of other more famous freedoms, and sometimes taken for granted,[1] many other civil liberties are enforceable against the government only by exercising this basic right.[2] The right to petition is regarded as fundamental in some republics, such as the United States, as a means of protecting public participation in government.”
It is so ingrained in our republic and constitution that even trying to tell you when you can petition is a major violation of the First amendment. State court is hella easy to file in and you are almost garuenteed to prevail if you have any writing experience whatsoever…..Bombard the courts people…I am already preparing my state case and petition as I proceed in my federal case….It’s your unconditional constitutional right….Don’t wait, Just Do it……Read the WIKI page…https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_petition_in_the_United_States

The right (of petition) embraces dissent, and “would seem unnecessary to be expressly provided for in a republican government, since it results from the very nature and structure of its institutions. It is impossible that it could be practically denied until the spirit of liberty had wholly disappeared and the people had become so servile and debased as to be unfit to exercise any of the privileges of freemen.” “Deprivation of it would at once be felt by every freeman as a degradation. It is not that government has accomplished the “impossible” of practically denying the right, but rather that the “spirit of liberty” has almost “wholly disappeared and the people have become servile and debased.” But “fitness” to exercise the rights of freemen is never determined by the many who have become servile, but by the few who refuse, at any cost, to surrender their rights to government.
It is for those very important few, lawyers, ordinary citizens and patriots, who carry the Nation’s full burden of liberty on their shoulders

Comment: My name is Greg. I would like to sue CDCR and challenge the ExPost Facto Law of making my parole 10 years long when I was originally only supposed to have 3 years of parole. This ruined my life! I got moved from a state group to a federal group in Sharper Future. I was supposedly the first 290 in the state to be allowed to do that, which allows me to meet once monthly instead of once weekly. I have done everything parole asked. I’ve never violated. I’ve been on parole for almost 5 years now. I’ve passed all of their bs lie detectors. I’ve gone to every containment meeting which they tell me I’m a “walk on water parolee.” They tell me they will actually recommend me to discharge at 7 years and it’s unfortunate for this to have happened to me. Ex Post Facto Law is not supposed to be applied if it is punitive in nature. 7 more years of parole is punitive in nature, period! I want to sue them for everyday I’m on parole past three years. I want to take this overkill law down so no one else has to suffer thru what I have. I want off parole, please help. If you need to contact me, 325 864 5386, or xwgxwg40@gmail.com. This is a fight worth fighting. Hundreds of parolees are in my shoes and the payday could be quite substantial. Let’s do this!
Purpose: Select an Option / General Inquiry

1 4 5 6