CA: L.A. County Sued Over Ban on Sex Offenders as Poll Workers [by ACSOL]

[usnews.com 5/7/18]

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Two registered sex offenders are suing Los Angeles County for the right to become poll workers.

City News Service says the suit filed Monday argues that the county’s policy banning offenders violates state law and the Constitution.

The suit was filed by two offenders who live in the county and by the Alliance for Constitutional Sex Offense Laws, a nonprofit group.

California’s sex offender registration website lists more than 13,000 people in L.A. County, including those convicted of nonviolent offenses.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

🤗 Go ACSOL!!👍 (I’m comforted to know that white-collar criminals, meth-cookers, felony DUI drivers, and those convicted of [yes, even] voter fraud are still permitted to be poll workers. Oh, and employees of the Russian government are also welcome to volunteer! [sarcasm])

This is the way to success: hit them with a law suit every time. Eventually the tables will turn.

Thank you Janice!

Personally, I think it is unjust that registrants are not allowed on school grounds on Election Day (and why is Election Day not a National Holiday, so that people can vote on a day off, BTW?). There should be an exception to the ban on school property, on Election Day, if a registrant’s polling place is on school grounds (and the entry is made solely for the purposes of voting).

If a registrant’s polling place happens to be on a school ground (which is for many, including myself), then the only method to vote is through mail-in ballot. I think this disenfranchises many of our votes. We’ve long paid our price for the crime we’ve committed. Why are registrants singled out?

Thank you, Janice!

What’s the reasoning for the ban? Voting automatically excludes minors. And its being done in a public place so you can’t even claim you’re trying to trick someone into a dark room.

It’s funny how most polling places are done at either schools or public libraries where most RSO’s are not allowed to go. This prevents us from excusing our constitutional right to vote making the governments attempt to control us (dare I say it), unconstitutional.

Of course you could do what I did to avoid the issue all together. I’m a permanent mail-in voter.

If Janice wins this, I’m going to apply for a job at my poling place. I could use any money I can get.

Justice or the two parties D&R securing just us?