ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly MtgsJuly 14 – Phone (AUDIO),
August 11 – San Diego, September 15 – Berkeley, October 6 – West Sacramento, October 20 – Los Angeles [details]

Conference Videos Online

ACSOLCaliforniaNational

ACSOL Conference Attracts More than 170 People from 14 States, Identifies Future Opportunities in 2019

More than 170 people required to register, their loved ones and supporters from 14 states attended the second annual ACSOL conference in Los Angeles on June 15 and June 16. The conference included four plenary speakers as well as 12 workshops.

“We shared information, energy and support during the conference,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci. “We also provided essential tools for daily living to people required to register as well as their loved ones.”

After a warm welcome from ACSOL President Chance Oberstein, plenary speaker Laurie Jo Reynolds opened the conference with a unique message — the need to effectively frame the important messages we have to deliver to the public, to elected officials and to judges. Plenary speaker Bill Dobbs later spoke about the fact that it may take many years to succeed at restoring the civil rights of people required to register and compared our movement to the gay rights movement of past decades. Plenary speaker Ira Ellman spoke about the importance of busting myths about re-offense rates such as those used by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2003 decision stating the requirement to register is not punishment. The final plenary speaker, Catherine Carpenter, focused upon recent progress made in state supreme courts and federal circuit courts of appeal that have declared that the requirement to register constitutes punishment and therefore new laws cannot be applied retroactively.

The conference offered a wide variety of workshops such as Employment Opportunities, LGBTQ Issues, Domestic & International Travel, Registrant Success Stories as well as California’s new Tiered Registry. The conference also included a workshop devoted to Effective Advocacy during which attendees were encouraged to join ACSOL in Sacramento in early 2019 to improve the Tiered Registry law which would require anyone convicted of a felony child pornography offense to register for a lifetime.

During the final plenary session, ACSOL announced that it will join Women Against Registry on September 10 and September 11, 2019, in Washington, D.C., in order to educate federal elected officials and policy makers.

“The year 2019 promises to be full of opportunities to Show Up, Stand Up and Speak Up,” stated Bellucci. “We urge people required to register, their loved ones and supporters to make plans to lobby in Sacramento in February, to attend the ACSOL conference in Los Angeles in June and to participate in the education of federal lawmakers in Washington, D.C., in September.”

Videos of some conference presentations as well as power point presentations will be added to the conference website in about one week.

Join the discussion

  1. totally against public registry

    Thank you Janice and team to inform and involve citizens on the registry. I wasn’t able to make it this year but my husband and I benefited tremendously form the vast amount of information given out at last years conference…

    Thank you everyone for all that you do!

  2. AO

    Thank you Janice. It’s wonderful to have such a great group of people working to help us all. I know many states are not so lucky.

    I have a question regarding various courts having ruled that the registry is punishment and can’t be retroactive. I thought if the registry was punishment, then it couldn’t be applied post supervision, not just applying future laws retroactively? Is there some difference here?

    • Lake County

      It’s because SCOTUS ruled that the registry was not punishment. Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003) We must someday contest this ruling with SCOTUS. Although some States are realizing it is punishment.

  3. David

    Great conference! Next year, can there be at least one session on effective Outreach to other registrants? I would love to see us increase our numbers and multiply our population of activists.

  4. E

    Excellent conference. I hope SW Law School has a larger venue so it can double in size next year! So great to have the meeting at a law school and thanks to the law students for attending and esp Dr Carpenter and other excellent key notes for speaking!

  5. Not Really

    Wow, that 170 is 0.017% of the about million RCs. Isn’t that discouraging?

    • AJ

      @Not Really:
      Wow, that 170 is 0.017% of the about million RCs. Isn’t that discouraging?
      —–
      Not Really. 😉 If you subtract out minors, those on supervision, those in hosprisons, those who cannot take off work, those who don’t have the funds, those with mobility issues, and those who don’t go online and knew nothing about it, that 1M number is cut down quite a bit, I’m sure.

    • Tim Moore

      That’s not discouraging to me, because conferences don’t change much by themselves, do they?

  6. Not Really

    Even if the actual number were only 10,000, why not encourage more participation? Do most sit on the sidelines waiting for someone to do something? That was the point.

    • AJ

      @Not Really:
      Even if the actual number were only 10,000, why not encourage more participation?
      —–
      I think the encouragement is there, but there are hurdles and barriers across the board for why someone wouldn’t attend. Apathy could indeed be one, hopelessness another, cynicism another, almost off the lists yet another.
      =====
      Do most sit on the sidelines waiting for someone to do something?
      —–
      Most? IDK. Some? Certainly. I would speculate a large portion are hanging hope on some successful lawsuit(s) somewhere changing things. That seems to be happening….slowly. So for some, that may be sufficient. For others, perhaps not, but they lack the resources to attack.
      =====
      Just out of curiosity, were you one of the 170 who attended? I was not, for one or more of the reasons I’ve cited just above and in my earlier post. I’m definitely not apathetic, and do actually have a strategic plan for my situation.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *