ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings [details]
11/17- Phone
, 12/08 – San Diego

Emotional Support Group: (Los Angeles) 11/24, 12/22 [details]

Registration Laws for all 50 States

National

VA: Longer sentences for violent sex predators

[fredericksburg.com – 7/2/18]

THE Commonwealth of Virginia recently announced plans to expand a facility that treats convicted sex offenders who have served their prison sentences, but are considered too dangerous to release back into the community. It is alarming that the center has already exceeded its initial residency projections just 10 years after opening in 2008.

The Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation in Burkeville will increase its current capacity from 258 to 450 beds to make room for former inmates classified as sexually violent predators (SVPs). The $110 million project will also expand spaces for treatment programs and support services.

Virginia is one of 20 states that has laws (Virginia Code § 37.2-900) permitting the civil confinement of SVPs whose mental abnormalities or personality disorders put them at high risk of reoffending.

After a psychological screening using the Static-99 test, in which higher scores correspond to higher rates of recidivism, an interagency Commitment Review Committee identifies inmates who have a prior history of committing sexually violent crimes, especially against victims under age 13, or were declared incompetent to stand trial.

The committee then makes a recommendation to the state attorney general’s office, which reviews the case and then decides whether to petition the court for civil commitment. The court makes the final determination as to whether the individual is to be conditionally released or confined indefinitely. Offenders are entitled to an annual hearing each year for the first five years, and every two years thereafter.

In a 1997 case, Kansas V. Hendricks, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states may “take measures to restrict the freedom of the dangerously mentally ill”—including SVPs, provided that they satisfy due process and other constitutional requirements. “Commitment is not tantamount to punishment,” the court stated.

However, an article published in the Regent University Law Review that same year pointed out that “former sexual offenders have no potentially convincing evidence to show the soundness of their mental state against the overwhelming evidence of their past actions.” It also raised a good question: If those civilly confined are dangerously mentally ill, “what justification the state has for initially punishing these same victims via the criminal law?”

Read more

 

Join the discussion

  1. Eric Knight

    If a Martian came to Earth with no knowledge of Earth events but a fundamental understanding of common sense, the Martian would conclude that civil commitment had one purpose only: to slap on a life prison sentence on all such offenders of those who were only adjudicated with a few years incarceration sentence, all due to the hysteria of the teeming mobs known as the Public.

  2. totally against public registry

    Civil commitment and longer sentencing are not the answer! We need to look to bringing the perpetrator and victim/survivor together for healing and moving forward. Love and forgiveness go a long ways. These are such simple human relations basics but some scientists have such a cut and dry way or looking at things-Hanson

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *