September 15 Meeting Recap

California RSOL met in Los Angeles with about 45 registrants, family members and supporters at the ACLU building in Los Angeles on September 15. The focus of the meeting was issues involving registrants such as residency restrictions, city and county ordinances, and future litigation. Information was shared during the meeting regarding the recent decision of a California appellate court that a blanket restriction prohibiting sex offenders from living hear places where children congregate is unconstitutional.

“This court decision has a broad and positive effect upon registrants on parole,” stated state organizer Janice Bellucci. “CDCR can no longer require all registrants on parole to abide by residency restrictions.” She warned, however, that this decision could be overturned by the state supreme court in the case People v. Mosley. That case has been before the court for two years and a decision is not imminent as oral arguments have not yet been scheduled.

The topic of recent city ordinances was also discussed during the meeting, in particular ordinances passed by the cities of Simi Valley on September 10 and Lancaster on September 11. The Simi Valley ordinance requires some, but not all, registrants in that city to post a sign on the front door of their residence stating “no candy or treats at this residence”. It is estimated that this ordinance will apply to almost 70 households, including the households of 4 registrants whose addresses are not posted on the Megan’s Law website.

The Lancaster ordinance is much broader in scope and prohibits all registrants from being within 300 feet of a public park, swimming pool, museum, library, arcades, movie theaters, etc. The ordinance also prohibits more than one registrant from staying in a hotel or motel and from decorating his/her house for Halloween.

“These ordinances are unconstitutional and must be stopped,” stated Bellucci. “California RSOL will assist in filing lawsuits to stop their enforcement.”

Others speaking at the meeting included psychologists Barry Levy and JoEllen Wiggington who both counsel registrants. They shared stories regarding recent abuses by parole and probation officers including the removal of a tattoo and the requirement to obtain a land line phone. Three members of the California RSOL board of directors attended the meeting, including author Frank Lindsay, who wrote of his experiences as a registrant in the book “We’re All in This Together.”

California RSOL will return to Los Angeles on November 10 and will meet at the same location, the ACLU building at 1313 W. 8th Street. Meetings are open to registrants, family members, and supporters but closed to media and government officials.

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is a question, not a comment… Did Barry Levy or JoAnn Wiggington over suggestions on how to deal with parole or probation officer abuses?

Sorry I missed the meeting but was curious to know if there was any talk on new legislation by Tom Ammiano to reintroduce the tiered registration. Thanks!

Yes, Barry shared two stories of individuals on either parole or probation who went to court to contest a specific condition of parole/probation. In one case, the condition was a requirement to obtain a land line phone and that condition was found unreasonable. In the other case, the condition was removal of a tattoo. I don’t believe a decision has been made yet in that case.

I can almost guarantee Residency Restrictions will be ruled unconstitutional. THere isn’t another conviction (Murder, Manslaughter or Gang Ties) that exists where anyone is banned from living in a general area or what not. Furthermore, these Halloween restrictions are a joke. Seriously. Who on earth can tell another person what Holiday Festivities they can participate (its their own property) in. ITs surreal. The Mayor of Simi Valley and Lancaster are seriously out of control. No Court that exists today will rule either of these so-called laws constitutional? The worst part of all of this is the waiting game of both sides taking these waste of time laws to court. Its truly just a big joke thats affecting many families.

Sorry I missed the last meeting.
Ill be at the nov 10 meeting
Finally a smart networking group.