ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

National

IN: RSOs and Social Media Prohibition

A recent Indiana statute prohibits most registered sex offenders from using social networking websites, instant messaging services, and chat programs. John Doe, on behalf of a class of similarly situated sex offenders, challenges this law on First Amendment grounds. We reverse the district court and hold that the law as drafted is unconstitutional. Though content neutral, we conclude that the Indiana law is not narrowly tailored to serve the state’s interest. It broadly prohibits substantial protected speech rather than specifically targeting the evil of improper communications to minors. * * * Court Decision:  John Doe -v- Prosecutor, Marion County

John Doe -v- Prosecutor, Marion County

Join the discussion

  1. C

    Outstanding!

  2. Tired of hiding

    You know something.

    America might actually get back on track if the Constitution was actually followed. It has been abused for so long that it might not seem possible but it really is the only thing that makes America different from any other country.

    • anon

      I agree. The constitution works when it is actually followed. However, as long as politicians ignore it for their own agendas, I’m not holding my breath as far as America getting back on track.

      • Janice Bellucci

        I am more optimistic than you, Anon. The fact is our country has fallen off the constitutional path more than once, but we eventually find our way back. The significant problem, of course, is the many people who are harmed along the way. In the case of California registrants, it is now more than 100,000 people who are being directly harmed and then possibly another 500,000 people indirectly as it affects family members and loved ones as well.

        • DZ

          And if Prop 35 had had it’s way it would have added another, what? 3 or 4 hundred thousand to that list to be classified as ‘sex offenders’?

          It seems to be a wildly swinging pendulum tug-o-war right now for which direction it is going to go, as far as human rights are concerned.

          Makes it hard to predict where it will end up.

          Fingers crossed that this cultural war will end up a victory for sanity and constitutional rights, but fully prepared to leave the country if it all goes wrong.

        • anon

          I hope you are right. The number of people affected by these laws is growing daily and it is unsustainable in its present form. I am glad that there are people like you helping to get us back on track!

  3. none

    now if we can get facebook to change their policy on that !

    • Nicholas Maietta

      Facebook used to have the legal authority to block anyone they wish from using the service. However, that was when Facebook was a private corporation. Fast forward… they are now a publicly traded corporation. That means, i can buy shares, making me part owner. That should, in theory give me the right to use the service. However, even if i owned shares, i would not be able to use the service?

  4. A Friend

    Good point nicholas…also the discrimination by casebook..whatever ..
    is blatant and glaring …they might as well said Jews blacks Arabs
    Indians and so on when they group discrimination …its still wrong.

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.