ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (4/17 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings
ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18, 2021

ACSOLCalifornia

TRO Application Filed to Halt Enforcement of Lancaster Sex Offender Ordinance

An application for a  temporary restraining order (TRO) was filed today in federal district court requesting that enforcement of a sex offender ordinance in the City of Lancaster be halted.

“The Lancaster ordinance denies the civil rights of more than 100,000 individuals and families in California,” stated Janice Bellucci, President of California Reform Sex Offender Laws (RSOL).  “It prohibits people who made a mistake, but who have paid their debt to society from entering public places such as parks, schools and the library as well as private places such as movie theaters, arcades and the bowling alley.  This prohibition adversely affects registrants’ family members as well.”

The City of Lancaster unanimously passed an ordinance on September 11, 2012, that prohibits all registered sex offenders (“registrants”) from entering some public and private places as well as from residing in the same home, apartment and hotel with limited exceptions.  The ordinance also prohibits registrants from entering public shelters even in the case of an emergency such as an earthquake.

“The California Reform Sex Offender Laws organization testified before the City Council of Lancaster during the two meetings at which this ordinance was discussed,” stated Bellucci.  “We told the City Council members at those meetings that the ordinance violates both the state and federal constitutions, however, they chose not to heed our warnings.”

California RSOL filed a lawsuit in federal district court on December 18, 2012, challenging the Lancaster ordinance.  A similar ordinance adopted by Orange County was declared to violate the state constitution because it is preempted by state law according to a three-judge panel in Superior Court.   That decision is currently on appeal, however, the Orange County Sheriff has publicly announced that it will not enforce the county ordinance.

Jan 10: post corrected – “application” added. Admin

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

As always, God Speed, Janice and everyone involved at CA-RSOL!!!

Ditto! Thank you, Janice, for continuing to be an advocate for the voiceless and downtrodden. I believe in Karma… you got some coming your way!

Thank you Janice and RSOL…..I cannot applaud you enough for what you do. One step at a time.

Sorry, I don’t mean to be nitpicking, but just to seek clarification. The way you wrote this is a bit unclear, I can’t tell if the TRO has been issued by the court or if you are merely saying you are asking for a TRO. “A temporary restraining order (TRO) was filed today in federal district court requesting…” To me, that an order “was filed in court” means it was issued by the court. There is no order until the court issues an order. (And of course, all the action the court takes is filed in the record. Oh, you… Read more »

Oops! Meant to say that we FILED application for a TRO.

It’s important to keep the dominoes falling! We sued the City of Simi Valley and stopped enforcement of their Halloween ordinance. Then the City of Lake Forest repealed their ordinance. Now we are suing the City of Lancaster for passage of their ordinance which is the worst of the worse. The clear and important message we are sending to elected officials through these legal actions is that passing a sex offender ordinance will not help them to get elected.

I think a secondary message is that passing laws that violate the constitutional rights of American citizens (even those labeled as sex offenders) will be challenged and lost so they are better off not going down that road to begin with!

Now is a great time to keep the momentum by going after the other illegal laws currently on the books and being used against American citizens such as life time registration which is clearly cruel and certainly unusual punishment.

Yes, keep the momentum going!

It certainly is cruel & unusual punishment when ‘registration’ is open to change and reinterpretation and then applied retroactively. They use the legal concept of protecting society from present danger, but the statistics do not bear it out. RSO’s as currently defined overwhelmingly are not a persistent threat to society, so our rights are not justified in being taken away. It is an excuse whose real motivation is wining accolades from a duped voter base by creating bogeymen and then oppressing those bogeymen. I remember in the 1980’s all of the public energy focused on drunk driving, with organizations like… Read more »

….and all costs awarded from that city , county, or state…. causing them to really check their position before action against citizens ………big big money lawsuits would do that.

“The California Reform Sex Offender Laws organization testified before the City Council of Lancaster during the two meetings at which this ordinance was discussed,” stated Bellucci. “We told the City Council members at those meetings that the ordinance violates both the state and federal constitutions, however, THEY CHOSE not to heed our warnings.” It is obvious that huge money settlements are needed in these cases. The Cities are willfully violating the rights of citizens. Knowing that what they are doing is against the constitution. The city attorneys of these cities need to be sued along with each and every city… Read more »

So many different challenges going on! I love the aggressive, systematic process for suing the state on several different fronts in Federal court.

Would it be possible to consolidate all the CARSOL cases in one area, including court docket information? I would LOVE to attend some of the court sessions involving CARSOL. I realize one can’t predict when the court may issue a ruling, but I’m talking more when initial arguments are made. Thanks!

GREAT WAY TO GO !!

These are some very good news. Someone needs to pay attention to what is going on in Florida as well. There is similar legislation which was enacted quickly and unopposed, without taking into consideration the rights of innocent family members. In Florida a SO has to go as far as having a “special code” within the driver’s license. Our government is creating a sub-class and not that different than when a certain regime ordered a certain class of people to post a certain symbol by their places of business/homes, and ultimately their items of clothing and their skin.

Why is nobody talking about palmdale they already have Lancaster rules ineffect!!!!

Where are the jobs, Every job dose sceening and their focus is on sex offenders

15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.