FL: 9 Investigates crackdown on sex offenders inside Disney World


A six-month-long Eyewitness News investigation has uncovered sweeping background checks at Disney parks in central Florida — checks targeting registered sex offenders.

Investigative reporter Christopher Heath dug through hundreds of pages of Orange County Sheriff’s Office trespass reports, and they show a consistent pattern of documented sex offenders getting kicked off of Disney properties. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

soon… anyone can instantly deny service by swiping your driver license through a system.. Even though the Megan list should be use to inform the public for its protection not denial of service…

And we continue to see how vile – ignorant, prejudiced, and stupid people can be towards the children of registrants. They should be ashamed!

First, I agree…to a point… about Disney refusing service to certain people. That said, it is not a black and white issue. For instance, there is nothing in their TOS that indicates that registered sex offenders (gradations notwithstanding) are banned from the establishment. This is easily actionable.

Now, to more pertinent points: The registrant had purchased the tickets in conjunction with his family’s tickets. Had the establishment had simply denied selling him his ticket in the first place, then the registrant may have planned his family vacation differently. Instead, he allocated hundreds of dollars, perhaps thousands when travel, hotel, and other incidentals are all calculated together, with the expectation of being able to go to Disney without problems. It was ONLY when he got to the park and scanned his thumb, and presumably other security checks, was he refused admittance.

Ostensibly, the park uses its own standards for refusing admittance; in this case, inclusion on the sex offender registry was one of them. But it says nothing of it in its TOS; instead, it has clauses which indicate that someone could get kicked out if his BEHAVIOR, once admitted, was deemed to be criminal or disruptive. So a registrant would have NO KNOWLEDGE if he were allowed in the park or not.

It is unclear if the registrant got a refund on his ticket, but the TOS clearly states that being kicked out for the above reasons did not entitle a guest to a refund; since the registrant never even entered the park, this could not be the underlying reason for not issuing a refund on his ticket.

Another point: if the registrant lived outside of the state of Florida, and were refused admittance on this basis, then he would not only have Florida state laws but US Constitutional commerce clause violation statutes protecting him in this manner.

Finally, there is the point of differing standards: Other registrants who pay single use tickets or other such methods will not be checked on the registry, which leads to a due process violation. This is especially problematic for the park to defend, as either they now have to check everyone coming into the park, or nobody, no matter how they issue their tickets.

In my opinion, a registrant would have a very good case against Disney. Since there is no explicit restriction against registered sex offenders in the TOS, and there is no reasonable way a registrant could know whether he would be restricted or not until he was checked, then that easily puts the burden on Disney to defend.

My question: We have Disneyland, in Anaheim. I wonder what the trespass list looks like at the Anaheim PD with regard to season holders for Disneyland. If there are any, that could potentially be a lucrative case for CARSOL to consider.

I’m sure it does… Anyone remember that stink awhile back about a sex offender who’s register address was in the heart of Disney (I think the main hotel in the actual park)

I’m not certain what states make it illegal to deny business services to registrants, however CA does but appears to do nothing to enforce it. Face book is in the business of thumbing their noses at the law but I have not heard of anyone challenging this. Does anyone know if CA has taken face book to task about their policy or do they just side with money?

Nothing that comes out of Florida should shock anyone but we have even grown used to these types of practices here on the West Coast. The problem with the list at large is it does not inform the business when the conviction took place. As I’ve said in previous posts, anyone convicted at 1944 (69 years ago!) could face this type of harassment and I don’t see lawmakers lifting a finger to address this blatant breach of constitutional rights.

Disney has tons of money so I hope they get hit hard with a lawsuit, not for the damage it will do them, but for the justice that should be rendered to the registrant and his family. When Disney talks about “Family Values” they ought to have the stones to come out and say “That Children of Registrants Excluded!” There is no right way to do the wrong thing, especially thing like this that undoubtedly have Walt turning in his grave…

“Legislation proposed in Washington state last week would allow businesses to deny service to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender population and others, based on religious differences.”

“And others”? In certain respects it would seem society/humanity is regressing.


This is a really, really, really disturbing article. In essence, people need to really take notice of this. In summary, the thought of a business establishment banning someone for a prior criminal history is highly disturbing! I mean, what’s next? Background checks prior to entering amusement parks? Malls? Movie Theaters? Water Parks? Maybe in another 10-years we will see signs stating: Those convicted of felonies aren’t admitted? Don’t take this lightly. This is very, very serious. What’s next? Did you know there are some states requiring Sex Offenders to special drivers licenses stating they are SEX OFFENDERS? Uh, can you imagine going to a bank or trying to get a loan or purchase an automobile? I mean, can you imagine trying to apply for a credit card, bank loan or showing a potential leasing agent your ID? Thats very disturbing. Whats next? Computer chip implantation? We already have (Im not sure or aware of the exact details) sex offenders being released from Prison who must wear ankle braclets? Unbelievable. I’m in awe. Unless something is done, this will only get worst?

I did want to add one item. This was a little thought provoking. I actually visited Marina Land San Diego about a year ago. I had a wonderful time. ALthough, something happened when I entered the park that really caught my attention. After paying and just prior to entering the gate, EVERYONE was required to provide a thumb print? I was a little perplexed. In essence, I wasn’t paranoid about anything, but it was kind of shocking? I’ve never entered any establishment where I’m required to provide a thumb print? What if i had refused? What do they do with the thumb print? Any thoughts? I can only imagine that if something had occurred that day out of the norm (abduction/robbery/?), they might have ran the prints? Or, maybe they would hand over the prints to the police? DO they have the right to do this? Or, what do they do with the prints? This is an interesting topic and something to think about!

ODisney turns away sex offenders but people on there are not all preditors some are on there for indecent exposure or whatever else there’s all kinds of reasons why people are on it. I think if they’re not gonna let people on the registry in then it should be the high risk ones that are a major risk to the public.

Since someone just mentioned this issue in another thread, I figured I’d make this comment here to let the new people aware of this. I have also heard that Disney uses facial recognition software too at the entry gate (if not throughout the park). But really, how many RC have actually committed any crime within their parks or hotels? Gang activity is always the biggest problem for any amusement park, that’s why most have metal detectors. if you want to go to a Disney park and/or hotel, just put the room in someone else’s name and come with a prepaid day pass. AAA offers good day pass discounts. (Although it’s not worth going for the price).