Residency Restrictions Removed in L.A. County

Residency restrictions for most registrants residing in Los Angeles County have been removed, according to a Superior Court decision. The decision, in the form of a blanket stay of enforcement, was issued by Judge Peter Espinoza on March 18.

The stay of enforcement applies to all registrants currently on parole who are unable to find compliant housing. The decision allows the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) an opportunity to request from the court, on a case-by-case basis, an exemption “upon a showing of cause why a parolee is not entitled to a stay of enforcement’.

The decision also notes that CDCR may continue to apply residency restrictions to registrants who “have a history of sex offenses against children and who have recently been determined to be a ‘high risk offender’ from living within a half-mile of a school. The decision remains in effect until the state supreme court completes its review of the case, In Re Taylor.

“This court decision is significant in that it stops the virtual banishment of registrants from living in many parts of Los Angeles county,” stated Janice Bellucci, President of CA RSOL. “Threats by the City Council of Los Angeles to build pocket parks will no longer have the desired effect.”
There are more than 11,000 registered sex offenders in Los Angeles County, according to the California Department of Justice website. It has been reported that there are more than 100,000 registered sex offenders in the state of California.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

23 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Woooohoooo!

But we just finished building our pocket park!

– Harbor Gateway

These people just saw this attempt to restrict where registered former sex offenders live just influenced the courts decision by trying to build parks to force RSO’s out. These people HAVE to understand you can’t step on on the constitutional rights of ANYONE.

I applaud Judge Peter Espinosa for stepping in and doing the right thing to prevent many people from being tossed out into the streets. His term on the CASOMB has given him a better perspective of the struggles that registrants face when they’re released from prison and are trying to reintegrate into society. Both he and assemblyman Tom Ammiano have my utmost respect for taking the research they gleaned while serving on the CASOMB and making a conscientious effort to make some crucial changes. And Always Thank You to the crew at CARSOL; It’s good for my soul to see positive things happening.

What is the status of residency restrictions in Orange County now?

This is certainly a step in the right direction. Thank you Janice and CARSOL for the work that you do. You are much appreciated!

When is it.Ventura countys turn? We are la Countys neighbor. How do you start this process?