OR: Lawmakers pass univ. autonomy, tiered sex offender system bills

Lawmakers rushed to approve the final pieces of a two-year budget and leave Salem after 155 days — five shy of the constitutional deadline to finish their work.

One of their final acts was passing an $800 million bonding package to fund construction projects around the state, including a 174-bed psychiatric hospital in Junction City. Some Republican legislators criticized the project because of the high costs associated with staffing and operating the facility after it’s built.

The package, however, passed each chamber with a large majority Monday. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  18. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  19. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  20. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Its difficult to follow that without knows the language of the statutes behind the statute numbers. However, bottom line is that Tier 1 can petition to stop registering after merely five years, not the 10 years we have been pushing for! And the other tiers can petition to be classified to a lower tier — I’m not clear, but that might be the process for them to finally end SOR, lowering their tier one at a time.

I’m not clear what Oregon’s tier 1 offenses are. I do not presume they include all the low-level offenses for which California requires SOR. But note: while the federal requirement for SOR is a minimum of 10 years, that applies only to the offenses for which the feds require SOR — and Oregon is setting a lower limit for offenses not on the federal list.

I don’t believe the feds require SOR for any misdemeanor, nor for many or any low-level felonies even. At any rate, the feds do not require any SOR for many of the offenses in the proposed tier 1 for California that is being pegged at 10 years here, mindlessly adhering to a number in the federal law that doesn’t even apply to those offenses! For god’s sake, even Oregon’s 5-year minimum for those is too long.

Both California and Oregon should drop from SOR all offenses for which the feds do not require SOR — that is, simply conform, if for no other reason just so people can reasonably know what’s what, rather than have completely different standards everywhere you go — but also because there simply is no justification to be applying SOR to such low level offenses nor to bee spending all the money it requires to handles that registration for those offenses.

I note, it will do no good for anyone convicted in Calif.. to move to Oregon to take advantage of this bill. This bill specifically bars it applying to anyone convicted outside Oregon unless that jurisdiction would also provide similar relief.

I really have to agree with the both of you! To say the least, there are some individuals who have committed some serious sex crimes and deserve to be on the registry! Although, there are thousands of others who have been on the registry for years and never committed even a parking infraction! To say the least, this is getting old in California. The State is broke, the prisons are overcrowded and unlike prior to my legal issue, I have such a different outlook on the judicial system and police. I honestly feel the police like people being on the registry for job stability and it makes them all that more important. I plead to a wobbler Battery 18 years ago. Charges dismissed (expunged/ect) and I received SUMMARY PROBATION. I would love to move to Oregon. Here is really what gets me. This charge or what not is considered an other in California (its not a high risk or serious). ALthough, if I’m not mistaken, the Adam Walsh Law would make it a High RISK?