A 2004 state law requires the names and addresses of all registered sex offenders to be made public. On Monday, the state Supreme Court ruled that the law could apply to a Bay Area man who admitted molesting a child in 1991, when sex offender registrations were confidential. Full Article
Sex offender law affects past plea deal
- ·July 2, 2013
- ·1 Comment
Related Posts...
ACSOL Urges “NO” on Prop. 20, “YES” on Prop. 17
October 13, 2020
CA Supreme Court Considers Prop. 57 Case
October 7, 2020
CA: Number of Registrants Decreases Slightly
September 17, 2020
CA Supreme Court Schedules Prop. 57 Oral Arguments on Oct. 7
September 16, 2020
CASOMB to Meet Virtually on September 17
September 14, 2020
It seems to me those practicing law should now advise their clients that taking a plea agreement in any criminal case can have future unforeseeable repercussions.
Going along the thought of Justice Kennard’s dissent, if they can change the rules and you will be subject to them, you should have the right to withdraw your plea if you don’t agree with those changes. Apparently the courts don’t see it that way. If you take a plea, you are throwing yourself at the mercy of the court and zealous lawmakers to do what they will.
Guess we’re back to needing to focus on showing aspects of registration to be punitive but even that might be moot under this absurd ruling.