ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


NC: Court strikes down law banning sex offenders from social media

RALEIGH, N.C. — A 2008 law making it a felony for registered sex offenders to use social media websites in North Carolina was struck down Tuesday after a challenge by a Durham man.

___ ___., a registered sex offender from Durham, appealed to the state after being convicted in May 2012 of accessing a commercial social networking website. ___ alleged that North Carolina General Statute 14-202.5 violated his rights to “free speech, expression, association, assembly and the press under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.” Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Finally…a common sense decision. I hope it sticks.
Now I wish Facebook would be bound to a decision like that. It’s one thing when you’re a private, low-key Website used by few. It’s another thing when you’re a major medium of communications for the entire world. Some Websites won’t even let you comment unless you have a FB account – thus a violation of free speech in my opinion. Plus, FB is now a public company too.
Bottom line: the best source of protection for minors online is THEIR PARENTS!!!

The USA is full of brainless zombies running about like chickens with their heads cut off. Parents actually parenting their children! Not the way it’s done here in the USA.

That would work far too well and make too much sense…that’s not how we do it.

Let big brother look after them…after all, we all know that the government can be trusted. Right…

My comment in many of the threads blasting the judges’ decision:

Are these liberal, sex offender-coddling judges?

Rick Elmore, from (expand story)

Judge Elmore has been endorsed by North Carolina’s only elected Republican
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, I. Beverly Lake, Jr. (ret.). He is
also endorsed by the only Republican to win four statewide judicial
races in North Carolina, Associate Justice Robert Orr (ret.). So, the
message is clear:…tell everyone you know in NC to vote for Judge
Rick Elmore for NC Court of Appeals on Nov. 2. Because the Court of
Appeals is not an entry-level job, and being “conservative” is not

Christopher Dillon: endorsed for his position by the Johnston County Republican Party in his election for his current position.

Only Martha Geer could be construed as less than rock-red, fundamentalist Christian Republican, and to be elected a judge in NC one has to generally have more proclivities for prosecutors than for defendants.

I’d consider becoming a plaintiff against Facebook if needed. I’m an internet/computer expert from the early days, so I can provide technical advice relating to necessity of access to all web sites. In my Calif County I need Facebook for access to the Local News Media and Public Emergency info. We have no better media than Facebook for this info. We have no TV coverage and very limited radio coverage. Public access cable TV is useless here also.

Plus there are Government services I am taxed for but due to Facebook TOS, I am not allowed to access info from these services since I cannot open a Facebook account. Sounds like Government should not post info on web sites that all taxpayers are not allowed to access? Perhaps a good angle on a lawsuit?

I would like to see a (vague) law that says that no local, state government or any taxpayer paid program/service (including non-profits with tax exempt status) can offer services or information on an internet web site that is not accessible to all citizens. On the surface this law might sound non-threatening to politicians and might get good support without directly mentioning the SO issue. Might work?

I seem to recall California investing heavily into the Facebook IPO which in my opinion gives Registrant taxpayers a personal stake in the success of this venture. It seems illogical to deny this states 100k registrants from helping to make this corporation successful when we’re all invested one way or another.

I completely agree. It should be illegal for governments to use Facebook. Governments that I pay for should not be putting content places were I am “forbidden” to go.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x