ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

California

State attorney general launches initiative to reduce recidivism in California

Attorney General Kamala Harris has launched a new initiative designed to curb recidivism in California through partnerships between the California Department of Justice’s new Division of Recidivism Reduction and Re-Entry and the state’s counties and district attorneys.

The division will support counties and district attorneys by partnering on best practices and policy initiatives, such as the development of a statewide definition of recidivism, identifying grants to fund the creation and expansion of innovative anti-recidivism programs and using technology to facilitate more effective data analysis and recidivism metrics.

“California’s district attorneys bring vital experience to the challenge of reducing recidivism, and it is important their perspective is incorporated,” said Attorney General Harris. “This new division will support innovative, evidence-based approaches to recidivism solutions in California.” Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wow! I’m curious if this “new program” will be applied to SO’s, after all, don’t RSO’s have an astronomical recidivism rate? I hear it’s somewhere around 1.9%. Gee whiz Beav, can they get it down to zero? Well, on second thought, if the facts were publicized, then there wouldn’t be a scare, and if there isn’t a scare, then there would be no need for a registry. I’m so confused!

is this going to apply to rso? or everybody else except RSO?

It is all talk and 290s get nothing, nothing I tell you nothing…. thank you g.Scott 290

The recidivism rate is 1.3% for new sex crimes. 69.1% is rate for all recidivists. 1.9 is percentage of those recidivists who commit new sex crimes. 69.1% times 1.9% equals 1.3% of all convicts released. 3.5% of recidivists are fail to register. Get rid of the registry you will get 3.5% reduction in recidivism. Get rid of parole violations which are not new non sex crimes and you reduce recidivism 86.9%. Their figures, not mine. No need to get more money and do more studies. Do those two things and recidivism rate is reduced, public safety is not harmed (my… Read more »

What our opponents say about sex crime recidivism is that while the numbers are very low, many sex crimes are unreported, many that are reported result in no arrests, many arrests go unprosecuted and many prosecutions result in acquittals. All of that is correct. However, most of those sex crimes are date rape with alcohol, sex crimes within families (e.g., where the offender is the only breadwinner) and other sex crimes with close family friends. I am not aware of any RSO winning a “he said, she said” argument. Ever. I am not aware of a RSO committing another sex… Read more »

Of course not, its not going to apply to SOs

Sounds good. But why the impedous to reduce recidivism, when crime rates have already decreased in recent years. Beware of bureaucrats bearing gifts.

There needs to be a law to curb their recidivism, with all their ridiculous laws already on the books; the last thing needed is another law that doesn’t do what it was intended to do.

If they want to wage this new “War On Recidivism” effectively then they need to correctly identify the “enemy.” In order to do that, they should start by looking in the mirror and scrutinizing what they find. Next, they should take a look at the legislature, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Corrections Corporation of America, and the California Correctional Peace Officers Association (and similar organizations). Because they all have a common goal — to lock people up. If they really want to rehabilitate, they need to all need to get their priorities straight and adjust their policies.

The key words here are “new division of Recidivism Reduction and Reentry.” More money and more jobs. Milk that Cash Cow!!!

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.