Petition: Pardon all people arrested and coviction of Internet Sex Stings

Admin

The internet sex stings concerning the solicitation of a minor are unconstitutional and do nothing more than test the will of average law-abiding males with consensual sex. These stings do not protect anyone because teens do not typically search for adults to have sex with on adult sites. These stings are nothing more than entrapment and the courts do not see the damage nor the rights of all involved. These stings are done on adult websites where age verification is required. Law enforcement posing as minors who are posing as adults on adult websites trap innocent victims usings bait and switch techniques. Sign the Petition

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

49 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This morning I had a strange wake up call from one of the PO officers saying do you mind if I drive by and you can just wave at me from the front porch.. Seems strange that my former PO didn’t do anything like that or send out someone to check on me. Sure I could of said I’m busy entertaining or something like that but I let them have their folly. Its all part of the game. Heck if they wanted to monitored me or someone else they should of put a monitor on me in the beginning.

So did the devil really lie to eve? In so many ways one would have to say yes. These registry ordeals are outright lying to prevent, protect, or what? Yes this registry causes confusion and who is trespassing against who. Law enforcement know that they are doing evil and so does thee court systems that is why they give plea deals. Sure I would rather know nothing than to be a know it all type person or the one quick with the answer as that only brings on pride and pride goeth before the fall.

I have to commend you guys in this two way street ordeal of the registry when it is basically simple… and much of this registry is all a lie or con game. So who’s getting real today? Its about time we all get real to all this. I’m sure Janice and the team can look right thru much of this registry.

2
Reply

Here is an Excerpt from my Motion to Reconsider, I assume it will be denied via gaslighting by the Oakland County Circuit Court once again in corrupt Michigan:

==========================================================

MOTION TO RECONSIDER

mcr 2.119(F)(3) palpable errors mislead all :

The ‘Felony Information’ , which is neither, is invalid on its face

NOT ONE ESSENTIAL ELEMENT OF MICHIGAN LAWS WAS VIOLATED

THE MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ORDER IS WITHOUT AUTHORITY, IT INTENTIONALLY GASLIGHTS and TRESPASSES AGAINST DEFENDANT

============================================================

HONORING YOUR BIO PAGE / OATH / MICH LAWS / MCR / CONST IS EXPECTED

-1-

WHAT REAL LAW WAS VIOLATED, NOTICED , CHARGED or CONVICTED of ?  :

  1. No required child  – no belief the required child was a child
  1. No required commercial activity  
  1. No required knowledge that the child was a child.  
  1. No required minor – no belief the required minor was a minor
  1.  No required  preparation for commercial activity 
  1.  No required in-person sales of adult materials to the non-existent required minor. 
  1.  No required commercial gain – no dissemination / no abusive activity preparation
  1.  No required computer / Internet use to violate any  Michigan laws occurred 

d2c in the ‘Felony Information’ Count III : “ 4 Years and/or$5,000 “ which is not how d2c reads in the real untampered 52 word law :

(c) If the underlying crime [ no underlying crime was charged – zero wording from 722.675 – only a partial title ] is a misdemeanor or a felony with a maximum term of imprisonment of 2 years or more but less than 4 years, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 4 years or a fine of not more than $5,000.00, or both.

D2f in the ‘ Felony Information’ Count II : “ 20 Years and/or $20,000 “ which is not how d2f reads in the untampered 48 word law:

(f) If the underlying crime [ no underlying crime was charged, only 22 inapplicable words out of 152 from 750.145c2 ] is a felony punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of 15 years or more or for life, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both.

-2-

HOW MUCH LESS KNOWING COULD A PLEA BE ?

WHY IS THIS GARBAGE ALLOWED TO BE DISHED UP ON THE COURT?

Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1574

Void judgment. One which has no legal force or effect, invalidity of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally. Reynolds v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1087, 1092. One which from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree. Judgment is a “void judgment” if a court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. 

                   Klugh v. U.S., D.C.S.C., 610 F.Supp. 892, 901. 

How does a statutory court get jurisdiction from a few penalty words ?

How does this court get jurisdiction from 22 of 152 words ? Or from ZERO 
words of mcl 722.675 – the required underlying crime that is missing ?
 

HOW DOES THAT MANIFEST THE PROCESS DUE ?

Count I is the ONLY OAKLAND COUNTY COUNT and does NOT vest the Court 

with subject matter jurisdiction – The AG perjured venue in the other Counts 

so therefore personal jurisdiction along with subject matter jurisdiction is 

non-existent in the remaining counts.

 

NON-STOP LIES / PERJURY / DECEIT / FRAUD by the State AG Office

-3-

Since when is a charge, prosecution, plea conviction to 5 penalty words a valid criminal conviction ?

Where is the process due ?  Where is the proper Notice of Charges ?

Why is the Attorney General’s office allowed to commit these crimes for decades ?

With void judgments : 

“… it is as though Trial and Adjudication has NEVER BEEN . “
         Mich Sup Ct 1958    Fritz v Krugh ( see original motion ) 

i.e. PAY ZERO ATTENTION TO THE COURT OF APPEALS ORDER AS IT IS WORTHLESS AND TRESPASSES AGAINST DEFENDANT

THE PLEA WAS DUE TO TRICKERY and TAMPERED LAWS and must be thrown out.

I do not consent to the intentional willful fraud, fraud on the court , and fraud by the court officers involved.

==================================================================
Demand for immediate termination of unlawful sex offender registration and full entitled relief of all VOID JUDGMENT  – (see original motion)

Respectfully Submitted,

Dated : December 21st , 2021   

Thanks all4consolaws !

It’s a New Year and High Time the Corrupt Courts have truth shined into their darkness

5
Reply
1 2