Costa Mesa City Council to revisit sex-offender park ban [UPDATED]

UPDATE: Motion to repeal passes 5-0

The Costa Mesa City Council on Tuesday is scheduled to consider instituting a reward for help in identifying vandals and repealing a law that aims to rein in the movements of sex offenders. The Police Department has recommended that the council consider revoking a 2012 ordinance that bans registered sex offenders from entering city parks and sports facilities without law enforcement permission.

Costa Mesa’s ordinance was similar to ones passed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and Irvine City Council.

Two state appellate court decisions, however, have ruled against the legality of the Irvine and county ordinances.

According to city staff, the Orange County district attorney’s office, which supports the ban, will probably appeal the decisions to the state Supreme Court.

Staff also noted that Costa Mesa is also facing its own lawsuit against the sex offender ordinance. The case, John Doe vs. City of Costa Mesa, is pending in federal court.

The lawsuit, filed in 2012, originally targeted Orange County Sheriff Sandra Hutchens, Costa Mesa, Police Chief Tom Gazsi, and the cities of Huntington Beach, Seal Beach and Lake Forest and their police chiefs.

Lake Forest, its police chief and Hutchens have since been dropped from the lawsuit, according to federal court documents. Article

Agenda Item

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Wow, I’m kind of surprised to hear the police department is recommending revoking the ordnance. And I’m not surprised the district attorney supports the ban, of course we all knew that anyway; why cant Tony Rackauckas just accept his spanking, do his time in the corner and give it up? Whats wrong with this guy?

Good for the City of Costa Mesa to come to its senses.

However, that brings up the issue of all the other Cities that still have not taken this step. The fact that law enforcement is not enforcing these ordinances is beside the point. Which brings up another question – since when is it up to LE to enforce the law per their discretion? Is the law not the law?

Regardless, a registrant entering a park in a city with this kind of ordinance will still commit a crime. It says so in the Municipal Code. When a tree falls in the forest and no one is around, does it not make a sound?

The Appeals Court decision is over one month old at this point. This would have been plenty of time for ALL cities to add a repeal motion to their agendas and get the process started.

Few have. They should not get away with it.

I hope San Diego and the surrounding cities were included.

Motion to repeal passes 5-0. No discussion, no speakers. Mention that this is unconstitutional, barring a reversal by the Supreme Court, which the OCDA’s office is currently working on getting heard.