There have been some long, thoughtful comments regarding Compliance Checks in the General Comments section recently. To make sure they do not get buried they are moved to this post.
Related posts
-
CA: Gov. Newsom signals support for bill targeting consumers of child sex trafficking industry
Source: kcra.com 4/18/24 SACRAMENTO, Calif. —Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday signaled his support for a proposal... -
CA: Bill to make purchasing children for sex a felony in California moves forward, but with some changes
Source: kcra.com 4/16/24 SACRAMENTO, Calif. —A key California Senate committee on Tuesday moved forward with a... -
CA: Purchasing a child for sex is a misdemeanor in California, lawmakers to debate classifying it as a felony
CLICK HERE FOR UPDATED INFORMATION (as of 4/16/24) Source: kcra.com 4/13/24 SACRAMENTO, Calif. —California lawmakers...
Question,
Are there parameters that trigger compliance checks?
certain felonies
parole vs probation
attitude of local agencies towards PFRs
I had a misdemeanor with 3 yrs probation and no incarceration. The only time I was visited was the last yr of probation. I was on my 3rd P.O. , the previous were both women and they both came by once in order that the outgoing could show the incoming ( a 1st timer ) how to do a compliance check. The 3rd was a nice guy, but was a by the book person. He came by 3 times, but just a knock and a quick look inside from the doorway. That was only for 6 months , since he didn’t object to early termination.Nothing invasive. Since off probation I have received nothing. Not even a call or knock.
So I am wondering why some get what this described as a rather thorough visit while others like myself get basically passed over. I was punctual on all in office visits requested and never late for my annual. Just seems inconsistent. But everything pertaining to the registry is consistently inconsistent! 🥴😵💫🙃😎😂