NY: Dozens of sex offenders in Suffolk gave wrong addresses

Dozens of registered sex offenders living in Suffolk County provided inaccurate addresses in the year since county lawmakers passed a law to intensify monitoring of the ex-convicts, and more than 140 others were found to have violated rules requiring them to update their photos on a state registry.

Laura Ahearn, executive director of Parents for Megan’s Law, contracted by the county last year to monitor more than 900 registered sex offenders, told lawmakers Thursday that the increased scrutiny has led to an increase in arrests for violating state reporting requirements.

“It’s not necessarily about arrests and convictions. It’s about ensuring that this [sex-offender] registry is what it’s supposed to be,” Ahearn said. “It’s supposed to be a tool for the community to use to protect themselves and their children.” Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  18. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  19. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  20. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

What makes this law so outrageous is that a large part of it is based on enacting legislation after the fact and now assigning a civilian body to enforce a fundamentally flawed law and practice. Why don’t they just bring back the stocks and anyone can go down and publicly humiliate these individuals even more? My statement
is outrageous as well but it only mirrors putting in a pie in the sky solution, then getting average rookies to enforce it. The constitution is in shambles.

I feel like I should write my representatives and convince them to write a law based on the assumption everyone is a sex offender and therefore everyone in the United States needs to be registered…

“It’s supposed to be a tool for the community to use to protect themselves and their children.”

Yes indeed, the only tool you will ever need to protect your loved ones.
You can get it here for free.
Simply sign up on our web site and we will show you anyone who is a danger to you or your children living in your neighborhood.
Rest assured and feel safe with this amazing and dynamic tool.

Parents for megans law takes the public’s money, this should make all their records, public record. people should be digging in to them to see what they can find.

I seem to recall when they set up this vigilante parent’s organization to “monitor” registrants, this is exactly the kind of crap that we all predicted would happen.

What oath to uphold the law did these vigilantes take?

There was an artical that was on youtube a crimilologist that was looking into how easy it is to fail to register. Commeon things is that it could take 1 to 2 months before the data is updated to the website. Second someone could have just fat fingered the information by just one letter or number, maybe on accident or on purpose, who knows. And lets not forget that in Chicago many many can’t register because the doors are open from 8am to 3pm but close there doors at 1pm and denie a lot people to register. And just like here in Utah can’t register as homeless. So if someone is let out can’t find a job and is homeless, they are in violation to the civil commitment with punishment 1st as a misdemeanor then a felony if still homeless, which IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, can’t punish just because of being poor. It makes me wonder if they go to door around 10am, probably the most inconvenient time of the day and say, “I didn’t see them so they must not be there.” Just like in the past NAME and SHAME hit lists have always been cruel and unusual punishment and this is no different than just harassment.