Lawmakers call for review of sex offender oversight

Top state and federal legislators on Wednesday called for investigations of sex offender supervision in response to a high-profile case involving two suspected Orange County serial killers.

State Senate President Darrell Steinberg formally requested a statewide review of electronic monitoring and voter-approved housing restrictions. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, plans to request a federal probe focused on the local case. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Virginia, thank you for pointing out the lie at the end of the article. I don’t have an account. As with all similar cases of high profile crimes, the legislators are jumping in to suggest changes to the laws before the case is decided, these guys are proven guilty or not and all the evidence is known. Sounds like their minds are already made up. “Not allowing them into the general public at all, that is the only way to protect the public.” OK, so he knows the answer already, before the investigation. Why waste the money on investigations, when they already have decided what to do? The public actually pays these guys to think up our laws?

Here’s how this will play out:

1. They do their review.
2. Experts will tell them the registry is too bloated with tens of thousands of former offenders who pose virtually ZERO THREAT of reoffending. (something CASOMB has been saying for YEARS)
3. They will ignore this advice.
4. They will draft a bill with the name of the victims in an effort to look “tough” on sex offenders.
5. Roll credits.

Stupid is as stupid does!!!

You can never expect GPS monitoring to work. One, they are not set in real time, and two they are not fitted with cameras. They only work to solve a crime after it has been committed. That is not keeping the public safe. A person that is classified homeless has more liberties than a person that is not homeless. That person that is seen as a transit is very difficult even for the police to detect and monitor. Housing restrictions is the elephant in the room on this one.

This is a wonderful opportunity to turn a negative into a positive! We have sex offenders convicted of misdemeanors and other offenses from many years ago. What other criminal offense requires you to be punished with the registration process for life? Most sex offenses in other states allow you to fall off after 10/15 or 20 years! This is an incentive for those of us to live a law abiding lifestyle! California is in financial ruin, the police are understaffed and it’s now time to wake up and follow the footsteps of other states and make changes in the laws. Unless your some multiple convicted sex offender, people need to be able to get on with their lives.