ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Mar 30 – San Diego [details]

Emotional Support Group Meetings – Los Angeles:  Mar 23, Apr 27  [details]

Registration Laws for all 50 States

Save the Date: ACSOL Conference June 14/15 in Los Angeles

International

Mexico: Human trafficking survivor – I was raped 43,200 times

Mexico City (CNN)Karla Jacinto is sitting in a serene garden. She looks at the ordinary sights of flowers and can hear people beyond the garden walls, walking and talking in Mexico City. She looks straight into my eyes, her voice cracking slightly, as she tells me the number she wants me to remember — 43,200. …

Her testimony was used as evidence in support for H.R. 515 or Megan’s Law that mandates U.S. authorities share information pertaining to American child sex offenders when these convicts attempt to travel abroad. Full Article

http://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/FA16/20150514/103457/HHRG-114-FA16-Wstate-RomeroK-20150514.pdf

Related

Utah A.G. Sean Reyes urges Congress to pass international Megan’s Law

H.R.4573 – International Megan’s Law Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar (Updated – reintroduced as HB515)

Join the discussion

  1. ab

    Anyone who reads the number 43,200 is going to freak out. However doing minimal research I uncovered the minimum age of consent for Mexico as 12. This is a Mexican federal minimum with each state varying from puberty to 15. Granted penalties do exist for non consensual sexual activity with someone under eighteen, but laws and prosecutions vary from state to state. Of course prostitution involving anyone under eighteen is illegal throughout Mexico. As horrible as her story is not enough details are provided to know all the circumstances and the exact degree of illegality of everything she claims. Moreover 43,200 is merely her estimate. Was she really raped that many times in four years? Were there some instances where she consented?

    More importantly she makes no mention of U.S. citizens being the ones who paid her. On those grounds alone I would say her testimony has no relevance in pushing forward United States law. Mexican law, absolutely, but not United States law.

    • Q

      They will only freak out if they are really gullible. 43,200 is extraordinarily high and extremely not able to be proven to be accurate or true.

  2. Janice Bellucci

    There is no doubt that this woman has been significantly harmed and those who forced her into prostitution should be punished. There is great doubt, however, that there is any link between what has happened to her and the proposed legislation. Instead, the legislation is yet another fear-based reaction that would not solve the problem that has been identified. For that reason, California RSOL opposes H.R. 515.

  3. Q

    So…let me get this straight. This chick (obviously being used by so called “human rights advocates” and the US government; with a plea for $$$ at the end) are saying that somehow what happened to Karla can be prevented if (obviously the US government pushing this one) advanced notification of someone already being victimized by the state registry is reported to nations the person intends to travel to? Even though nobody or any agency has ever offered any concrete proof (or any proof) that US citizens travelling abroad do so for the sole purpose of “victimizing” young impressionable local girls? And somehow what Karla’s own countrymen did to her is tied in with US citizens on the illegal registry here?

    I’d really like to see the statistics of all the registrants from this country (or any country) that have been caught and arrested for engaging in human trafficking (the seemingly new favorite tool to instill fear in the room temperature IQ types), and convicted.

  4. Joe

    This sounds like a terrible story, but with all due sympathy, what does it have anything to do with HR 515?

    This was a Mexican victim and ALL Mexican participants IN Mexico. From the relative who abused her as a small child, to the man who preyed on her, the mother who turned her 12-year old(!) out on the street, to the men who used her for paid sex, to the corrupt police men who betrayed her and their position and further abused her.

    What on earth does any of this have to do with a guy with a criminal conviction for inappropriate photos wanting to spend 5 days in Cancun?

    Has this story even been verified in some form? And why does she get to speak in front of Congress? Does anyone here get to speak on the subject to these decisionmakers? I am sorry if I sound harsh, but they are MY / OUR representatives. Not hers. At least 53 of them are.

    The most frustrating thing is that reason completely makes an exit when these matters are at hand. I would imagine one does not become a Member of Congress without at least a solid college education. Which, one would assume, would include some lessons in relevance and even CAUSALITY.

    And can not hope that one, at least one of these politicians would have the balls to say, hey – this is not relevant, and certainly not causal. Just one.

    That is the most upsetting, that these people simply are not rational. I might as well argue with my German Shepherd. Same intellectual level, same outcome.

    • Timmr

      From what I see, rationality does not play well to the general public. These politicians are smart enough to know emotion and spectacle make laws. Facts? Ehh, they’re made up to fit the emotion that is driving the public. People connect on an emotional level to those who are suffering and offer help without even thinking if what they are doing is actually helping the situation. Brain science has show that that is how we are wired.
      Like it or not, I think we are going to have to find a way to tap into that emotional force. Facts tend to motivate those already in agreement with you. Right now government propaganda, which is all the registry is, has placed registrants in a category of being subhuman, and that turns off the empathetic energy in the brain, and therefore people can’t see how this is affecting us.

  5. mch

    Suspicious at best…just part of the ongoing scam and lie.

  6. commenter1

    *** INTERNATIONAL MEGAN’S LAW REPORTED WITH AMENDMENTS FAVORABLY BY THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS on 11/10/2015 ***

    http://www.foreign.senate.gov/hearings/business-meeting-111015
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/515/amendments
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/515/all-actions
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/515/text

    As of 11/12/2015 no amendment information has been received. Any idea what these amendments say? I tried to watch the meeting of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on 11/10 but there was no live audio or video stream available for that meeting. Our government does these things behind closed doors so it looks like we need to just “trust them”? I guess the bill now moves on to the Senate floor for a vote?

  7. Harry

    This is like blaming winding roads on airplanes crashes.

  8. David

    Assuming she was forced to “work” 12 hours per day (11 a.m. – 11 p.m.), she had 2 1/2 “Johns” every hour, EVERY DAY, for four years. Sorry, I doubt the veracity of that claim. But more to the point, she was obviously presented in order to shock panel members into advancing this bill without actual thoughtful consideration.

    • Joe

      No kidding. Let’s show them ‘Escobar, Paradise Lost’ or ‘Narcos’ (Life and Death of Pablo Escobar) and DEMAND that everyone EVER caught with a baggie of weed be restricted in travel.

      That is about the same relationship.

    • Q

      She needs to prove her claims. The panel members need to ask for proof.

  9. mike t

    The ends doesn’t justify the means. My crime was as closely related to this scenario as the bombings in Paris. But, tug at the heart strings and Americans will sacrifice all rights (of Others) for peace of mind. This article is merely a fund-raising effort for CNN’s “Paper Airplane” to help end slavery campaign.

    Do they target this law at people who’ve been convicted for soliciting prostitution that are NOT required to register? It seems like that would be a little more sensible to me. It’s just another poke at registrants who’ve been deemed re-punishable under the guise of regulatory measures.

    • Timmr

      “Do they target this law at people who’ve been convicted for soliciting prostitution that are NOT required to register?”
      I had that same thought about the internet identifier requirement of Prop. 35, seeing that most registrants’ victims are acquaintances, not prostitutes. The fact one is on the registry just makes him an easy target for inclusion in these laws, call it legislative laziness.

  10. USA

    My question is, are those convicted of offenses not related to children ect banned from traveling abroad?

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please answer this question to prove that you are not a robot *

Michael Dickson Womens Jersey