Big headlines make bad laws (Opinion)

When horrific and ugly crimes make headlines, politicians like to seize the opportunity — to make their own headlines. So when Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky sentenced former Stanford student Brock Turner, now 21, to six months in jail — he served only three months — for sexually assaulting a woman who was too inebriated to consent to sex in 2015, California lawmakers did not hesitate. The same California Legislature that just passed the Restorative Justice Act, which touted alternatives to incarceration, shamelessly passed two tough-on-crime laws. Both are now on the governor’s desk. Full Opinion Piece

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This is fantastic – I have never been a fan of Debra Saunders on other issues – but I am so proud of her and SFGate for this column.

This is her second column dealing with the registry, if I am not mistaken.

I don’t find it too surprising. Too many people are absolutely ignorant of Constitutional authority because of their partisan instinct to always categorize actions according to political entity, not truth.

In fact, anything that detracts from the original intent of the US Constitution, and the 58 state and territory constitutions that further refine this great document, is the real culprit. A constitutionalist is most probably associated with conservativism, but not necessarily a Democrat or Republican in nature, where most of the politicians (and unfortunately sheeple) reside. I’m not even talking of ANY political party, be it Green, Independent, even Libertarian. I’m talking about common sense here.

Unfortunately, and perhaps expectantly, most people are one-dimensional when it comes to children and rationality. It is, in fact, human nature to protect children at all costs; they DO represent the continuation of our species, to a point where even their safety supercedes our own. This one-dimensional approach, by definition, borders on irrationality, which of course is the basis for understanding why people cannot render sensible standards when it comes to sex offender laws.

And political forces trump even that irrationality, particularly on conservatives. This is now at a point where courageous thought and action cannot be taken lightly. Kudows to Saunders for her article, as she has received tremendous amount of flak not only from liberals but her conservative peers; that is, those conservatives still blindsided with the irrational behavior about protecting their kids at all costs, even if by rational standards, what they are doing is actually creating a WORSE place for their children in the long run.