PA: Supreme Court Further Restricts Sex Offender Registry

The registration of sex offenders in Pennsylvania, known as Megan’s Law, has had a tumultuous existence, including a number of revisions to comply with several successful challenges before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Last month, the state’s high court further refined the state’s sex offender registry. The Supreme Court made a ruling that will have an impact on determining which sex offenders will be considered lifetime registrants. The court narrowed the ability of the authorities to designate an offender as a lifetime registrant as the result of being convicted of multiple sex offenses in a single incident. Full Article – Free Registration required

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Is there a link that doesn’t require you to subscribe?

I didn’t register or read the article, but this sounds like a good thing for most!

The gist:

The decision means sex offenders convicted of Tier I offenses including luring a child into a vehicle, institutional sexual assault, indecent assault, corruption of minors and possessing child pornography will not be required to register for life on their first offense, regardless of the number of offenses that grew out of a single incident. (Very much like Static 99)
THE COURT’S DECISION REQUIRES THAT A ONE-TIME OFFENDER MUST BECOME A RECIDIVIST TO QUALIFY FOR LIFETIME REGISTRATION.

“Given the obvious burden of registration and the potentially serious criminal consequences of a lapse … to state the law is not ‘penal’ is little answer to a defendant who had good reason to believe he had done all required of him, only to find himself staring at lifetime registration,” wrote Dougherty.
An offender must have a chance to rehabilitate before being penalized with a second offense, the high court found.
“We do not dispute the commonwealth’s argument that each image of child pornography possessed represents a separate, independent crime,” Dougherty wrote.
However, Dougherty said, clear and simple, “the statute requires an act, a conviction, and a subsequent act to trigger lifetime registration for multiple offenses.” •

what a stupid site even after registering I couldn’t veiw the article..crazy

“Often the distinction is based on whether the consequences are civil or criminal. The decision with regard to sex offender registration got a little murky after the A.S. decision.
The Supreme Court has held the registration provisions are not punitive for purposes of constitutional challenges. However, the high court acknowledged in A.S., “Whether the statute is deemed a penal one subject to the rule of lenity and strict construction or not … the fact is that interpretations—and predictions—of the statute’s effect have to be made…”
“Given the obvious burden of registration and the potentially serious criminal consequences of a lapse … to state the law is not ‘penal’ is little answer to a defendant who had good reason to believe he had done all required of him, only to find himself staring at lifetime registration,” wrote Dougherty.
An offender must have a chance to rehabilitate before being penalized with a second offense, the high court found.”

Maybe, just maybe, the courts are beginning to understand that registration and the many related registered offender laws ARE PUNISHMENT!!!

It would be nice to be able to read the article without signing up. We registrants are already paranoid about giving out too much info. However I did find a round about way to read the article. Copy the title of the article and paste it in the google search engine. Click on the Legal Intelligencer link at the top and the full article pops up. Don’t ask me why but it seems to work

Sorry folks. I just found out it only works thru page 1. For page 2 & 3 you have to register & I’m not about to. But it would have been nice to know what the rest of the article is about

So, this site is asking me to signup (create a login and password) to read an article that pertains directly to me (I am a PA registrant) which I will then have 3 days to report my login directly to the state police in person or face the possibility of prosecution. If something unexpected were to happen and I am unable to report that login then I am screwed. I’d rather not read the article and not be able to assist in any type of remedy for my registration than face the possibility of prison. How is that for the government keeping control over me?

This separate article addresses some of the issues of the above posted on the forum.

http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/pennsylvania-supreme-court-nixes-lifetime-megan-s-law-registration-for/article_11859ff8-6565-11e6-a294-db9ef1036f3d.html

Seems like a combination of the the Pennsylvania court decision & the AWA tier system actually benefited this man. What struck me the most is he was charged with 77 felony counts of possession but ended up with 3 years probation. Thomas Lutz-Morrison better thank his lucky stars he didn’t get caught in Florida where he could easily be facing over 20 years to life

Just enter a bunch of gibberish to “register” for the site. There is no confirmation email sent, so you can view it immediately. I just entered a phony made up email address, and I had instant access.