​Judge Rules Fontana’s “No Registrant” Policy is Preempted by State Law 

A Superior Court Judge issued a tentative ruling on May 23 that a Fontana Unified School District Policy which prohibits all registrants from visiting schools in that district is preempted by state law and therefore must be stopped. The judge’s final ruling in this case is expected within 30 days. “This is a tremendous victory for registrant parents whose children attend schools in the Fontana school district,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci. “It also sends a clear message to other school districts that have or are considering similar policies.”

The judge’s decision was based, in part, upon existing state law that creates a right for the public to enter public facilities, including schools, as well as existing state law that creates a right for parents to both participate and observe activities on school campuses. Neither of the existing state laws includes exceptions for registrants, however, there are additional existing state laws which authorize schools to remove if they disrupt school activities. Finally, there is a state law which requires registrants to obtain written permission before visiting a school.

As part of his decision, San Bernardino Superior Court Judge David Cohn ruled against the school district’s argument that ACSOL lacked standing to challenge its policy. The judge declared that ACSOL has standing in the case as a matter of public interest. He noted that although there is no evidence in the record regarding the number of registrant parents in the school district, it is likely that there are or will be registrant parents in that district.

According to the California Megan’s Law website, there are at least 247 registrants living in the City of Fontana and more than 3,500 registrants living in San Bernardino County. The Fontana Unified School District includes all of the City of Fontana and some of San Bernardino County.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

16 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Great!

Interesting. Probably not the last word, since it’s only a superior court judge.

What I am wondering is how this will affect SB 26.

Congrats, Janice and ACSOL!!!

Great job! Great lawyering!

CONGRATS TO ALL AND THANKS TO THE JANICE TEAM for all that worked so hard on the lawsuit to get the
message out to them that this group affected directly has rights and deserves protection from our Constitution.

Show up, Stand up, and Speak Up DOES make a difference!

The baggage I carry every day becomes lighter every time Janice and team scores a victory on behalf of registered citizens. I for one am extremely grateful.

Congratulations! Such great news. Big slap to the face to those trying to keep suppressing law abiding human beings. Let’s push on! Make those donations!

I pray that this matter is ALWAYS preempted by state law. We must STOP SB 26!!!!!!!

Congratulations, Janice and the rest of ACSOL!

Fellow registrants and supporters, ACSOL can’t do it without our support! Let’s follow those action alerts and make donations regularly.

The anti’s call her “Batty” Bellucci because her batting average is damn near a thousand. 😉

You go girl!!

hmm the right to enter public facilities..I am going to have to look into that. Is that a fundamental right? does that right have a judicial history?

Fantastic! Thank you very much for the continued efforts on this uphill battle! Hopefully each time one of these “small” battles is won it will cause FACTS to be examined instead of blind EMOTION used to pass “feel good” but do nothing laws!

The war rages on but let us take a moment to savor this victory!