Janice’s Journal: Next Two Weeks Could Make Huge Difference

The next two weeks could make a huge difference in the lives of more than 100,000 registrants and their families. That difference could be a decision by the Senate Appropriations Committee to release the Tiered Registry Bill (SB 421) from the committee’s Suspense File on May 25, the deadline for this action to be taken.

The Senate Appropriations Committee’s decision will be based, in part, upon the budget analysis for SB 421. Therefore, it is important to understand what the analysis has to say.

First, the budget analysis for SB 421 projects that there will be a major one-time cost of about $10 million over a three-year period to implement the Tiered Registry Bill. In an annual state budget of more than $150 billion, that is a small amount and could easily be absorbed.

Second, the budget analysis for SB 421 projects “minor to moderate costs savings” in the “tens of thousands” to local law enforcement agencies and only $75,000 annually to the state’s general fund. These projected savings are extremely low and are inconsistent with statements made during meetings of the CA Sex Offender Management Board regarding the number of registrants who will be eligible to petition for removal from the registry.

Third, the budget analysis for SB 421 includes references to the need for a “person-by-person review” that includes the original offense of offenses for which a person has been convicted. This language is troubling because it could include consideration of original charges, which are often “stacked” by District Attorneys. This language is also troubling because it is similar to language in the Tiered Registry Bill that requires judges to consider pre-conviction factors such as nature of offense, age of victim and whether victim was a stranger when decided whether an individual’s requirement to register will be terminated.

Finally, the budget analysis for SB 421 questions the amount of time it would take the CA Department of Justice to implement a tiered registry due, in large part, to make major changes to the agency’s existing IT systems. The analysis then suggests that the author of the bill “may wish to examine whether the current dates in the bill (2019) impose a realistic timeframe to implement a new registry.”

We will observe with concern the actions of the Senate Appropriations Committee on May 25. If the Committee is wise, it will release the Tiered Registry Bill from its Suspense File so that the bill can be voted upon by the full Senate on or before its June 2 deadline.

Budget Analysis – May 2017

Read all Janice’s Journal

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

OK, here is my question. There are a lot of shortcomings and details in SB 421 that can easily backfire and put people in a worse position than the law we have now. Why all the pressure to get this thing passed when there are so many things wrong with it? The grass isn’t always greener on the other side of the fence!

they are equating trivial sums of money compared to the lives of so many they’ve destroyed! the CASOMB’s youtube video should be the only consideration in any committee

Petitioning should be reserved for Lvl 3’s. They should have a chance to redeem themselves and the rest should fall off. Isn’t that how a “Teired System” works? Why is a Life Sentence on a damn Teir proposal in the first place??? Their Time scales are seriously out of wack. Along with them justifying non violent crimes as violent ones.
I don’t advocate Anarchy, but seriously our government has over stepped far too much.

My hope at finally being free has just been crushed. Whoever did this budget analysis obviously has an agenda, and that will likely prevail.

Well, I think there will be a significant cost savings in the long run. We might be at 150,000 in 10 years? They also should look at the current status of the offender (plea/etc). DA’s always tend to overcharge etc

When this proposed bill first came up, I was cautiously optimistic, but I was concerned that it could do more harm than good. Unfortunately, it seems to me that my concern may become reality. The bill is a political hot potato to begin with. That was expected. Now, I think that if it comes out of suspense, it will be so jacked up by the time the amendments get done, it will almost certainly make things worse, rather than better. At this point, it is my opinion that we don’t have much to lose by letting it stay in suspense, then letting the whole system collapse on itself. There seems to be a lot of that going on in government at the moment. And the fact that the group who was supposed to analyze costs is actually projecting their vision of what the law and policy actually should be, is a very clear indicator of what we can expect from the folks who will attempt amendments.

If we go by the naysayers then we are lost. What input will come from the LEO’s and DA’s who seem to support this bill? I would hope we can see more level heads who can look beyond the COSTS and see the INCOME if we are all allowed to be free to work and earn money and pay MORE taxes. The ROI from the bill will far outweigh the small savings outlined. Also with the new gas taxes we will be allowed to travel more and buy more gasoline. Buy houses, rent nicer (more expensive) apartments, go to entertainment venues, but new cars, etc. etc. So I hope that it can be pointed out to the committee that the savings are just a small part of the bill.

Don’t get me wrong I agree, giving them discretion is the worst thing, I had a discretionary hearing after 6 years and it was all bad, Pointed out the 13 year age gap at the time of offense. And I’m sure they will do it again. Now After 13 years of passed I’m sure they will spit the same B.S

Wonder what the total combined loss of money that we’ve all forfeited due to, low job status, social status, and being detoured from any higher education cause we would have to register at given school-college…their budget matters but ours doesn’t, got it.

We must remember that public opinion and laws change. Change happens incrementally. In this country there was a time when people owned other people – just unimaginable today! There was a time when if you got caught with a bag of marijuana, you did serious time. There was a time when there were no drug and alcohol treatment centers. Now there are drug treatment programs in jails and prisons. Drug addicts were viewed as a scourge and should be locked up or worse. Take the homosexual’s struggle, now there is gay marriage. It takes time for the ignorance to end. I am with Janice. This bill is nowhere from perfect, but is a step in the right direction. There will be a time when each case will be judged on its own merit. And the notion that we are all dangerous, for the remainder of our lives, will eventually be dispelled. This Bill will give much hope, the hope that our life sentence on the registry will come to an end. Hopefully law enforcement will scream loud! Law enforcement knows that processing and tracking citizens that have not been in trouble for years is a colossal waste of time and a ton of money.

On another note…….It might not be popular what I have to say with this group, but I am very remorseful for all the harm I have done. I don’t feel my case was properly adjudicated or justice served, but nonetheless did something harmful. And for me taking responsibility for the harm done is key to change. And I firmly believe one of the ways to turn the tide, is to demonstrate that we can live a life that never harms another human being. (Plus the facts with regard to recidivism rates.) Let us continue to demonstrate we are productive, caring, helpful people that should not be thrown on the human trash heap.

I wish part of the mission statement for ACSOL said something to the affect – “We highly value a firm commitment by registrants to live a productive life that causes no harm.” (It is hard for me to express what I want to convey.) When I into the legislator’s eyes, I want them to know we are about upright living. Many look upon us as human garbage, but we are not. Many of us did something we deeply regret and are doing so very well now. Passing all these punitive laws just causes more harm. It is not the solution.
I wonder if anyone in this forum feels the same way?

I will fight the fight for a treatment based/risk based system and for this punitive system of torment to be no more. Public humiliation and banishment is definitely not the solution.

Very well put Robert, I concur with all you said.

I am encouraged by the hopeful nature of many comments here. I think this bill is effectively dead. The Appropriations Committee’s job is to regulate spending. The only hope for this bill as it relates to this committee is if it saves money. According to the report, which is undoubtedly inaccurate, it would take 133 years for the bill to pay for itself. That’s pretty much the end of discussion IMHO. I will be ecstatic if I am wrong, but also remember this gets a floor vote and then a repeat in the House….

A few other cases were mentioned here and perhaps people are right that the future lies in the courts. If we can get judges to stop listening to bogus information and get them to understand the facts then registry laws face lots of problems. The thing is, most judges still believe the old inaccurate data about sex offenders. Hopefully that will change over time.

Well, it’s kind of amusing to find out that ” local law enforcement agencies spend between 60-66% of their resources dedicated for sex offender supervision”.
I’d like to see that pie chart.

It is also quite strange to read how the budget analysis can so callously monetize freedom. It’s as if registrants are a commodity like livestock. It reminds me of those 13th century crusades and the famous quote supposedly attributed to the Pope when asked how to determine who the true heretics were – ” Destroy them All! God will sort them out later!”

California. Time to emerge from the dark ages.

This is called a POISON PILL.

My fellow registrants, what we feel versus what the government wants to persist are two completely different ideas. Because there is no law to protect registrants, then everyone outside of the law making will make it more difficult for registrants to become a free person again.

The State of California truly doesn’t believe in second chances and it’s all because the false information that is glorified everywhere: Sex Offenders have a “high and frightening” recidivism rate. That 80% false fact is what allowed the SCOTUS to treat us all as one group, which, in turn, allows states like California treat us as one group of Monsters.

A poison pill is a process in bill making to thwart a bill from becoming law by adding ludicrous ideas within the bill. The end goal is media perception – ACSOL could not agree to pass a tiered bill, confusion in representing Sex Offenders.

Let’s look at the Negative parts in summary, then I’ll go over it in detail.
1. Startup fee of $10 million.
2. Minimal cost savings.
3. “Person-by-Person” review includes your old conviction when Petitioning.
4. IT infrastructure is expansive, time consuming.

Registrants are trying to fight to be a free citizen again despite already paying their debts to society. If we were to follow the max threshold identified in the 2003 Smith v Doe decision, many of the penalties registrants endure today are punitive factors in the 2003 decision. Negative factors 2 and 3 have been discussed ad nauseam of potential dangers.

1. Janice put $10 million start-up cost into perspective. The state budget is $150 BILLION. $10 million dollars is only 0.006% of $150 Billion dollars. $10 million is a minuscule amount to start up the tiered program.

2. Janice denotes the discrepancy in cost savings between what the state thinks and what she thinks. Janice see the potential to get about 80-90% of registrants off the registry. The state only sees 10,000 off of the registry out of the over 100K registrants. The state does not believe enough registrants will come off the registry with this tiered proposal. Negative Factor 3 is why.

3. At your petition, the DA can “stack” your old conviction to prevent you from every being free from the registry. See, the government doesn’t care how “mistake free” you have been for 10 or 20 years. In their eyes, you never moved on from your conviction. Essentially, you’re on trial for the same crime to EXTEND you compelled service to the state indefinitely. Remember, on the law books, registration is still a regulatory scheme as deemed by the 2003 Smith v Doe decision – who cares about the details and the threshold it no longer adheres to. There is no SCIENTIFIC REASONING BEHIND ALL THIS PETITIONING.

4. This one is how the government truly doesn’t care about registrants. This is IT structuring. Recall, Janice already sued California for not updating Megan’s Law map entries. There should be constant updating in infrastructure because it is the IT world with people coming and going… except, registrants rarely get off the registry. This implies that the registration class are IMMUTABLE from their current station. Immutable means unchanging over time or unable to change. Again, Negative Factor 2 represents this “immutable” station as the state doesn’t figure registrants will come off the registry.

While this tiered proposal seems like a step in a forward direction, there may be only 10,000 who may benefit from this proposal. The rest seems like a farce to which uses NO EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE. The DA’s involvement in the petition is highly suspect, but will also cost the state to pay for the presence of the DA, judge, and your own attorney. But this petitioning process is akin to being in jail and petitioning to get out of jail – except you’re told you’re a free citizen b/c you’re no longer under punishment custody and must continue to serve the state as a free person under power of law or be returned to jailed and punished.

Megan’s Law says it’s a duty to register. Law Enforcement imply it is a duty to register or you will be taken into custody and punished. Yet, in California and US Constitution, Slavery is prohibit; involuntary servitude are prohibited unless to punish a crime. If this is not punishment, then why must I continue to serve the state’s custody? But I digress.

This tiered proposal now seems like something to do just to do something instead of doing the right thing. There is no empirical reasoning behind the arbitrary years, petitioning, or cognition of empirical evidence. Janice’s concern should be taken at its highest caution. Believe in the what is in the proposal and not what you want out of it. This is not a great plea deal. And from the current state of things, the State of California doesn’t mind having a large registry. The risk levels mean nothing if everyone shares the same penalties – lifetime registration.

I dunno… all my prayers and hope lie within Peckingham and Snyder. I do not see California getting rid of their registry program. In-person annual registration, compliance checks, travel restrictions, living restrictions, employment restrictions, and dismissed convictions are all thresholds that surpass the 2003 Smith v Doe decision that California is implementing. No one in government, local and federal, seems to care that it is purposely creating a class that is immutable by law, not by choice. I just don’t see anything positive coming out of this tiered proposal… especially to be on trial AGAIN for the same conviction!!!! to petition off of the registry.

In jail, you knew there was a release date. Under probation, you knew there was a release date there too. But with the registry, you have cannot escape all of the penalties given unto you and there is no release date. It is a lifetime of losing your privacy as well as be restricted as if you were still on probation/parole.

Patrick Henry once said, “Give me liberty or give me death.” That’s how I feel. I paid my dues, but I am not free. I’ve earned my 1203.4, but I’m not allowed to enjoy the benefits of being released from all penalties and disabilities. Now, with this tiered proposal, my past conviction will be used against me on a petition that is not for a criminal case – double jeopardy. Some of you are stronger than I am. My brain is fried. I did my fighting… in court several times. And lost all, but one – 1203.4… because it was law that I was awarded it. The government only sees me as a monster. Who cares about risk levels. Who cares if you had no priors. Who cares if you jump through all their hoops. They will still see you only as a monster. That’s what the government has brainwashed within me. Every time I register in person… or to go to college… or read news like this. What’s the whole point of Dr. Ellman’s work if the government doesn’t believe in it to use it? Or Dr. Hanson’s work? I pray Snyder corrects the ills that the US government exacted upon every registrant. Registration is a cash cow for government as it’s job security for law enforcement and politicians.

So….on tha budget thing. 10mil to kickstart it? So that’s 400k RSO’s x $25ea= $10,000,000.
And I’m pretty sure they’re gonna make up a lot more $$$ when each of us pays to effing “petition”.

So my question is who performs the budget analysis? And, why would they have any say besides providing projections for the bill one way or another if it were to pass and be implemented.

It seems too me the budget analysis group have their own agenda there trying to voice that really doesn’t hold any weight.

This bill past the Public Safety Committee what 6 to 1! I see the bill passing here in this appropriations committee by a 5 to 2 vote (maybe 4 to 3), with the 5 democrats and 2 republicans on committee.

After 28 and 1/2 years it keeps my hopes alive.

Again! My fellow RCs: will the governor sign or veto?

I guess if this bill passes it will be helpful to alot of people no more allways looking over your shoder in constant fear and paranoia i think any one whos been on the registery for more then 10 years is scard for life it would take alot of counselling to deel with what they have been put thrue i just hope that with (SB 421) people who deserve a second chance get one and those who dont never get one some people are on the registery for the stupidest things that is insane to make them regerster for life but on the outher hand some people have done the most horrific crimes you can imagine multiple times and this bill is designed to weed them out and im all for it ..so with that being said i have hope this bill will pass

I guess if this bill passes it will be helpful to alot of people no more allways looking over your shoulder in constant fear and paranoia i think any one whos been on the registery for more then 10 years is scard for life it would take alot of counselling to deal with what they have been put thrue i just hope that with (SB 421) people who deserve a second chance get one and those who dont never get one some people are on the registery for the stupidest things that it is insane to make them regerster for life but on the outher hand some people have done the most horrific crimes you can imagine multiple times and this bill is designed to weed them out and im all for it ..so with that being said i have hope this bill will pass

Will Janice and ACSOL be at tomorrow’s hearing to give us updates on these Bills?

here is the amazing thing being arrested with 3 emails with 2 underage pics on each email and never distributing anything has me as a lifetime convict. I have a friend who got drunk and killed a pedestrian with his car he got 1 year in state prison and no one knows about it. What is wrong with this country.

The comments are quiet but hearing for AB558, SB26, and the Tiered Registry bill is today.

Is anyone attending?

Actually it’s on Friday, May 26th.

Today the Senate Appropriations Committee released the Tiered Registry Bill (SB 421) from its Suspense File. As a result, the bill’s author — Senator Scott Wiener — will take the bill to the floor of the Senate no later than Friday, June 2. While on the Senate floor, every senator will have an opportunity to vote for or against the Tiered Registry Bill.

“It’s time to Show Up, Stand Up and Speak Up,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci. “This is the time for registrants, family members and supporters to call the state senator who represents them and ask that senator to vote in favor of SB 421.”

It’s easy to identify your senator online at senate.ca.gov. Please call your Senator’s office in Sacramento (not the district office) and ask them to support the Tiered Registry Bill (SB 421). When you call the office, be prepared to give them your name and home address which won’t be recorded. That information is used for statistical purposes only.

“With the support of the members of our community, we will succeed in helping the State of California end a 70-year mistake, that is, requiring everyone convicted of a sex offense to register for a lifetime,” stated ACSOL President Chance Oberstein. The Senate Appropriations Committee, in a vote of 5 to 2, decided to release the Tiered Registry Bill (SB 421) from its Suspense File. As a result, the bill will move on to the Senate floor for consideration by all Senate members next week.

Also during today’s hearing, the Senate Appropriations Committee stopped Senate Bill, authored by Sen. Connie Leyva, from further consideration until at least 2019. If passed, that bill would have prohibited most registrants from visiting school campuses.

Will ACSOL be updating the results of the AB558 suspension hearing through the email news alert once it becomes available?