Canada: Polygraph for pedophiles – how virtual reality is used to assess sex offenders

Admin

In a maximum security mental health facility in Montreal is a “cave-like” virtual reality vault that’s used to show images of child sexual abuse to sex offenders. Patients sit inside the vault with devices placed around their penises to measure signs of arousal as they are shown computer-generated animations of naked children. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

12 Comments

Nothing new here. This peter-meter was used over 50 years ago here in California.

0
Reply

Again, we see the word “pedophile” used interchangeably with SO. This is the equivalent of saying all Muslims are terrorists.

What I find most disturbing and outrageous is that they actually think this is a credible science.

0
Reply
View Replies (3)

Doesn’t Canada using virtual child porn for any means affect the case they have against the guy that imported a child like sex doll?

On that, they claim anything virtual should count as real porn no matter what. But on this its ok? Contradiction?

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

This would be like putting a alcoholic in a room full of booze and say we are just assess you if you like booze. The UK has outlawed Japanese Anime and they are not real people but only cartoon drawings.

0
Reply
View Replies (1)

I wonder if the developers have used the device on themselves and if they’d be willing to publish the results?

0
Reply

Calling someone a “pedophile” is like calling a black man the N word to make him feel bad about himself and what he has done. And to put someone in a polygraph for exploitation is doing nothing good but fuel hypocrisy.

0
Reply

If this were used on a person, he was eventually released, then commits a crime that the researchers “put in his head”, I would think there would be an excellent case for suing the $$$ out of them!
Or maybe we should take further: use it on everyone …starting in their teen years! Catch “it” early, right? Public at large, here it comes!

0
Reply