Roman Polanski’s Rape Victim Takes His Side In Court

A woman who was the teenage victim in Oscar-winning director Roman Polanski’s 1977 sex case is expected to appear in a downtown Los Angeles courtroom Friday for a hearing in the fugitive filmmaker’s case. Full Article

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The District Attorney’s have used a sex crime against a minor to advance their own adjenda and career with little to no regard for the child victim? I have a truth to tell that sounds so outrageous and insane, like it could not happen in the USA court system.

…well, I’m going to go out on a dangerous limb here; at least in part because Ms. Geimer’s actual court statement there and afterwards keeps disappearing from the public record. For instance, the Los Angeles has erased the portion where she says that she was, “…a young sexually active teenager…”.

Actually, I was a little distressed by this erasure by the LA Times from their initial report in the obvious sense that not then and certainly not now is it acceptable to admit that teenagers are often and happily sexually active.

To admit what is true and natural and probably appropriate….simply can’t said. So below is her actual statement:

“He got arrested. I knew he was sorry the next day,” she said after the hearing. “I was sure he instantly regretted what he had done and wished it hadn’t happened. It just wasn’t as traumatic for me as everyone would like to believe it was. I was a young sexually active teenager and it was a scary thing, but it was not an uncommon thing. I understood much worse things happened to people. So, I was just not as traumatized as everybody thinks I should have been.”

Geimer also resisted the idea that Polanski was a pedophile.

“I was almost 14,” she said. “I wasn’t 10.”

Sigh…there is a lot of truth in the above statement.

Please understand that I’m not blaming the victim, I am not saying that what occurred is right or should have happened….

But it wasn’t and should not be the end of the world either. She finished saying:

“Everyone’s entitled to their opinion,” she said. “I was there. I am fine. I don’t think that I should be forced to lay my feelings bare and have a pity party for myself just for people’s entertainment, and I’m not going to do it. I am fine.”

Just telling the truth here, as did Ms. Geimer.

For which I give thanks.

Best Wishes, James

“Time served, no more jail time…BUT, you’ll need to spend the rest of your life on the registry, including whatever we decide that will bring along with it…sound like a good deal?”
“Jail time sounds better”

Let me start by saying I do not approve of what Polanski did, but I do believe that her statements should be taken into consideration and the charges dropped. News reports are calling her testimony about not wanting Polanski prosecuted, and people are acting surprised at her saying this, but it’s the same thing she’s been saying for years now. Anyone who has paid attention to this case has seen this for many years, and each time the media reacts the same way. Get over it people, she doesn’t want him prosecuted because she has taken an honest look at what happened, knows full well that she wanted it to happen and pursued him. It was 40 years ago, she’s moved on, the only reason the DA’s office can’t is because they want their name in the news, pure and simple.

This article is basically proof that these evil dirtbags don’t give a rat’s a** about actual victims. She hit the nail right on the head. It’s all about their careers. And they will victimize a victim to advance themselves. Pure evil!!!