Washington Post: How an Arizona couple’s innocent bath-time photos of their kids set off a 10-year legal saga

[floridaactioncommittee.org]

Lisa and A.J. Demaree’s decade-long legal ordeal started with, by all accounts, an utterly innocent family moment.

In 2008, the couple took their three daughters, then ages 5, 4 and 1½, on a vacation to San Diego. They snapped more than 100 photos during the trip, like parents do, including several of the girls playing together during bath time. When they returned to their home in Peoria, Ariz., they dropped the camera’s memory stick off at a Walmart for developing.

Within a day, a police detective came knocking.

A Walmart employee had flagged the bath-time photos as pornographic, the detective told the parents. One showed the girls wrapped in towels with their arms around each other; another showed their exposed bottoms.

The Demarees said they were harmless shots of the children goofing around, no different than what you’d expect to find in any family scrapbook. But police and social workers launched a full-blown sex abuse investigation, raiding the couple’s home and putting the girls in protective custody for a month while they interviewed dozens of family members and friends about whether the Demarees were child sex offenders.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

13 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Anyone remember the McMartin trial?

Moral panic leads to witch-huntery. So, now when a parent takes a photograph of their children nude, it must be that there is some sexual deviancy at play.

I don’t know which is sicker. The sexual deviant, or the ass hat running around with a mallet and wooden spike.

This is America?

….

This story always gets me steamed, utterly incensed at the cascade of gross incompetence, government overreach and a host of other injustices to this family.
Sadly, here in CA we have the opposite end of the spectrum in a case involving social workers who repeatedly ignored the horrendous, heart-wrenching abuse of an 8 year old little boy who died because of the profoundly evil actions of his parents and criminally incompetent lack of action by maladroit government social “workers.”

“The panel held that the social workers were not entitled to qualified immunity. Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, the social workers did not have reasonable cause to believe the children were at risk of serious bodily harm or molestation when they removed the children from their home without judicial authorization.”

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/01/23/14-16207.pdf

A shocking amount of child pornography changes hands every day in the dark corners of the Internet and whatever other channels pedophiles use to traffic sexually exploitative images of minors, as evidenced by the steady drum beat of arrests and sting operations by law enforcement. “Rarely a week goes by,” the FBI wrote in a memo last year, “that a child pornographer is not charged or sentenced for federal crimes related to the sexual exploitation of children.”

Especially from the FBI’s own website.

Jesus tap dancing Christ. Will this lunacy ever end?

So much happiness that they won and that the two social workers were stripped of their immunity. What an insane overreach. Then again, its not surprising at all when teens and preteen are regularly prosecuted and registered as sex offenders for no real crimes.

August 29, 2008: Guilty until proven innocent.

January 23, 2018: Found Child Protective Services weren’t entitled to qualified immunity and that they violated the parent’s and children’s constitutional rights.

10 years (at least) of pain and suffering for the parents and the children but they, especially the children, will be haunted forever by being taken away from their parents for NO REASON…no laws were broken by the parents and they were never arrested or charged.

ALL BECAUSE SOMEONE SAW AN INNOCENT PICTURE OF A CHILD’S BUTT. Fear mongering at it’s best.