VA: ‘Sexting’ teens could avoid felony charges under bill that clears Virginia Senate


RICHMOND — The Virginia Senate on Monday passed a bill intended to keep teenagers who willingly share sexually explicit images with each other from being branded felony sex offenders.

The measure, which passed on a bipartisan 35-to-5 vote, would give prosecutors the option to charge “sexting” among minors as a misdemeanor.

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Interesting, the article doesn’t distinguish between minors sexting pictures of themselves or pictures of others. Even more interesting is that, once again, a minor can be help liable for committing an offense but not for consenting to an offense in a different situation. At least some of Virginia legislators are trying to have some sense in that this issue should be the responsibility of parents.

“A less-serious, Class 2 misdemeanor charge would apply if the minor possesses no more than 10 images, and if he or she obtained them with the permission of the subject. That charge carries a maximum six-month sentence and a fine of $1,000. A first offender would be eligible for six months’ probation and 50 hours of community service.”

I thought teenagers were too stupid to determine sex matter for themselves. So they can consent to allow a nude photo of themselves to be taken and distributed, but not to have sex?

Nope, R M, I disagree. They should be charged with felony child pronography production and distribution – just like anyone else would be. It’s only by grossly swelling the ranks of these unconstitutional Registries with people’s children, grandchildren, brothers, and sisters, that the public will finally start paying attention to what the Hell is going on! Look, if John Q Public wants to get the scary dangerous child pronography producers off of the streets and out of society, then let’s give them exactly what they want. When more and more families begin to suffer the shame of having a child labeled a “sex offender”, when more and more parents go bankrupt to pay for criminal defense attorneys for their children, then people will start waking up!