CA: Wilk sex offender bill passes Senate with unanimous vote [Senate Bill 1199]

[signalscv.com 5/3/18]

A bill that State Sen. Scott Wilk, R-Antelope Valley, introduced to reform the release and placement for California sex offenders unanimously passed the Senate on Thursday.
Senate Bill 1199 would expand current protections against the ‘dumping’ of sexually violent predators into random communities. Now it would include, when reasonably possible, requiring authorities to take familial and community ties into consideration when determining where inmates convicted of registerable sex offenses are placed upon release.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Isn’t this just a guise to restrict where a registrant lives? I thought 290 was supposed to be for only police surveillance as denoted by Kelly v Municipal? This proposal states registrant have no choice of where to live. Odd. Are registrants still under parole or probation or are they free in the community?

It’ll never end until the registry is abolished. The supreme court made a horrible mistake and these are the consequences. As long as the registry exists and made public we will have these fires to extinguish. Thank you Janice and all! Lets go get em!!!!!!!!

@ AO,
We will Never truly be free to live/die
Work/play where we please once off probation/parole as long as there exists a Registry. Facts

Another worthless bill….Hey we need a new general comments for May. Anyway here’s this…

Why were these laws originally created???? I will tell you why. The mass hysteria over blacks supposedly raping and killing white women. So, the entire registration scheme, even though they may not have intended to punish when they were enacted (which I could and will contend they were intended to punish from the very start) they were also all predicated on irrational, prejudicial beliefs as well as irrational fears and hysteria brought about by the emerging mass media at the time, and the laws were being pushed through legislative process by the legislators who were playing demagogue and feeding on the fears of the populous to further their political agendas. Unfortunately, it is reemerging and repeating itself, only in order of magnitude, and this time targeting everyone convicted of a sexually related offense. But it is still based upon false beliefs, mass hysteria, pushed by mass media eager for top story headlines, and are once again being pushed by the legislators playing demagogue to further the politician’s political agendas.

What is it with these antelope valley hicks?

Well apparently I spoke to soon and should of researched the origins of the registry before spouting off. The begining origins of the registries is even more way out… Check it out…

http://www.solresearch.org/report/Origin_of_Registry

Pretty interesting…

His bill was fair for the persons needs to services, family and friend support so that person will have a better chance. How often does a SVP get released from the CaliHotel? Just think if the person is from out of state would be good to be close to family.

The Antelope Valley has a long history of feeling sex offenders are being “dumped” there. Of course, living in an area with a circle of support is best. But, for many, the victims (expanded definition) can demand the person on parole is not allowed to live in their county. Bottom line, politicians from the AV have been making their bones on the backs of vulnerable people and will continue to do so.

You may agree with this particular legislation, but be advised. There are sharp teeth hidden in the smile.