The problem Ron Book continually refuses to acknowledge – and I hope this documentary points out – is that none of the laws he’s lobbied for would have prevented his daughter’s assault.
TR
Guest
January 12, 2019 5:42 pm
I say Ron Book is a crook, and probably involve in something and that if he thinks that whatever he’s doing is legal that should indicate a pattern of suspicion.
Trapped
Guest
January 12, 2019 9:30 pm
Something that I wanted to mention. When arguing for or against the registry I always see the term ” after release from prison they are required to register”. I received a sentence of 5 years probation. Yet I am required to register for life. The registry is touted as a tool to protect families from dangerous people like me, yet the prosecutor and the judge found me to be so non-dangerous I wasn’t even sentenced to a day in jail. The registry isn’t punishment? I would have gladly spent 5 years in prison in exchange for my lifetime “non-punishment.
kat
Guest
January 13, 2019 8:12 am
Murderers, thieves, forgerers, arsonists….they are all reintegrated back into society after prison, walking the same streets we walk, visiting the same places we visit and no one seems worried enough about the re-offenses they might commit to put them on a registry.
As more and more juveniles end up on the registry because of computer misdeeds or sexting amongst friends, perhaps society will start to rethink the registry issues.
Jack
Guest
January 13, 2019 5:12 pm
I think nobody’s being honest about what the registry really is in the media. This is just a throwback to the 1600s when they would put a mark on a woman’s clothing for adultery in New England. A society let’s not forget that viewed women and especially girls, as property.
Dustin
Guest
January 13, 2019 5:35 pm
I’m willing to bet All of Ron Book’s anti-registrant activity is nothing more than making him and his daughter “untouchable” within the walls of the government, most of whom are already in his pocket. Any official who opposes them on anything gets touted as being anti-child, no matter what the issue.
Notice Lauren Book had nothing to say in the wake of the Parkland shooting, likely because that would have put Ron at odds with the NRA. The overall situation struck me as them being perfectly OK with children being mowed down with guns as long as they’re not having sex.
Tim Moore
Guest
January 14, 2019 11:42 pm
Trauma may make you depressed or reactionary, but the Books with this “we don’t need to look at facts, because we are traumatized” ruse is pretty grotesque.
Nicholas Maietta
Guest
January 17, 2019 11:57 am
1) Ron Book openly admitted to intercepting communications of registered persons and/or organizations working to reform the laws. (I’d like to know under what authority and the methods used, as as well as information gathered). I believe he and his team may have committed a criminal offense.
2) Ron Book openly admitted to punishing the registrants even after their sentencing, by using his “access” and legislative “powers”. Doesn’t this constitute grounds for taking down the laws? This needs to be seriously looked at.
Lisa Rogers
Guest
January 17, 2019 5:26 pm
If you watch the film, Ron Book’s babysitter is being deported back to Honduras. She escapes the registry. I’m sure many regisltered person’s would love the opportunity to escape the punishment of the registry. Maybe he should run off to Honduras and do his sex offender lobbying there. His daughter also has acquired significant amounts of money for her non-profit. She is making money off of being a victim. In the film, it appears as if Mr. Book cries big crocodile tears.
Here’s the side of Ron & Lauren Book that should have been in the Untouchable film, but isn’t. Feige had them dead to rights but decided to punt the ball on first down in the red zone.
The Books have been caught in numerous lies over the years. They lie in court, they lie in legislature and they lie on TV. Who is to say they aren’t at least embellishing, if not outright lying about this abuse narrative of theirs? I for one don’t trust people who are big, fat liars.
Will Allen
Guest
January 24, 2019 10:07 am
FairLaws (January 24, 2019):
I hear you. As I said, certainly some big wins have come from courts. But we have also prevented a lot of stupidity where I live just by attacking the people who wanted it.
I feel if we all did absolutely nothing except fight in courts that it would control a lot of it but we would have a Registry with a million people listed on it forever.
I think it is important to frame the Registries as an act of war. The Registries have gravely cost Amerika. They are today. That won’t change in the future. It is driving widespread hate and destruction. And murder. Amerika is devolving. People may not care much. I KNOW our enemies don’t and they have to be loving it. You want your enemies to be doing stupid, harmful, wasteful things. While the Chinese are kicking our asses, we are doing stupid.
I think it is important to run a non-stop propaganda campaign that exposes the Registry Supporters for the harassing liars that they are. I really think that the majority of people support the Registries because it gets them off. They LOVE gossip. Obviously, if the Registries were useful at all, we would have already had a national Gun Offender Registry. I think that should be repeated every single time that anyone opens their mouth. There is simply no way that it can be justified to have $ORs and not millions of other people Registered. Just can’t. So is that the kind of country that Amerika wants to be? One with millions incarcerated and millions Registered? Maybe.
But I also think it is pretty easy to frame Registry Supporters as helpless people who love big government. People who are not helpless don’t need Registries at all. Simple fact. We can run a campaign of truth that strong, smart, accomplished people don’t support Registries. Losers do. And I believe to the bottom of my heart that if someone would definitely learn/study/determine who it is that supports the Registries, it is overwhelmingly losers. It should be immoral, stupid, and not PC to support Registries. Get enough of the right people to say that and the sheep will follow. Most sheep don’t even know they are sheep.
The problem Ron Book continually refuses to acknowledge – and I hope this documentary points out – is that none of the laws he’s lobbied for would have prevented his daughter’s assault.
I say Ron Book is a crook, and probably involve in something and that if he thinks that whatever he’s doing is legal that should indicate a pattern of suspicion.
Something that I wanted to mention. When arguing for or against the registry I always see the term ” after release from prison they are required to register”. I received a sentence of 5 years probation. Yet I am required to register for life. The registry is touted as a tool to protect families from dangerous people like me, yet the prosecutor and the judge found me to be so non-dangerous I wasn’t even sentenced to a day in jail. The registry isn’t punishment? I would have gladly spent 5 years in prison in exchange for my lifetime “non-punishment.
Murderers, thieves, forgerers, arsonists….they are all reintegrated back into society after prison, walking the same streets we walk, visiting the same places we visit and no one seems worried enough about the re-offenses they might commit to put them on a registry.
As more and more juveniles end up on the registry because of computer misdeeds or sexting amongst friends, perhaps society will start to rethink the registry issues.
I think nobody’s being honest about what the registry really is in the media. This is just a throwback to the 1600s when they would put a mark on a woman’s clothing for adultery in New England. A society let’s not forget that viewed women and especially girls, as property.
I’m willing to bet All of Ron Book’s anti-registrant activity is nothing more than making him and his daughter “untouchable” within the walls of the government, most of whom are already in his pocket. Any official who opposes them on anything gets touted as being anti-child, no matter what the issue.
Notice Lauren Book had nothing to say in the wake of the Parkland shooting, likely because that would have put Ron at odds with the NRA. The overall situation struck me as them being perfectly OK with children being mowed down with guns as long as they’re not having sex.
Trauma may make you depressed or reactionary, but the Books with this “we don’t need to look at facts, because we are traumatized” ruse is pretty grotesque.
1) Ron Book openly admitted to intercepting communications of registered persons and/or organizations working to reform the laws. (I’d like to know under what authority and the methods used, as as well as information gathered). I believe he and his team may have committed a criminal offense.
2) Ron Book openly admitted to punishing the registrants even after their sentencing, by using his “access” and legislative “powers”. Doesn’t this constitute grounds for taking down the laws? This needs to be seriously looked at.
If you watch the film, Ron Book’s babysitter is being deported back to Honduras. She escapes the registry. I’m sure many regisltered person’s would love the opportunity to escape the punishment of the registry. Maybe he should run off to Honduras and do his sex offender lobbying there. His daughter also has acquired significant amounts of money for her non-profit. She is making money off of being a victim. In the film, it appears as if Mr. Book cries big crocodile tears.
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=uDwrL_1526695160
Here’s the side of Ron & Lauren Book that should have been in the Untouchable film, but isn’t. Feige had them dead to rights but decided to punt the ball on first down in the red zone.
The Books have been caught in numerous lies over the years. They lie in court, they lie in legislature and they lie on TV. Who is to say they aren’t at least embellishing, if not outright lying about this abuse narrative of theirs? I for one don’t trust people who are big, fat liars.
FairLaws (January 24, 2019):
I hear you. As I said, certainly some big wins have come from courts. But we have also prevented a lot of stupidity where I live just by attacking the people who wanted it.
I feel if we all did absolutely nothing except fight in courts that it would control a lot of it but we would have a Registry with a million people listed on it forever.
I think it is important to frame the Registries as an act of war. The Registries have gravely cost Amerika. They are today. That won’t change in the future. It is driving widespread hate and destruction. And murder. Amerika is devolving. People may not care much. I KNOW our enemies don’t and they have to be loving it. You want your enemies to be doing stupid, harmful, wasteful things. While the Chinese are kicking our asses, we are doing stupid.
I think it is important to run a non-stop propaganda campaign that exposes the Registry Supporters for the harassing liars that they are. I really think that the majority of people support the Registries because it gets them off. They LOVE gossip. Obviously, if the Registries were useful at all, we would have already had a national Gun Offender Registry. I think that should be repeated every single time that anyone opens their mouth. There is simply no way that it can be justified to have $ORs and not millions of other people Registered. Just can’t. So is that the kind of country that Amerika wants to be? One with millions incarcerated and millions Registered? Maybe.
But I also think it is pretty easy to frame Registry Supporters as helpless people who love big government. People who are not helpless don’t need Registries at all. Simple fact. We can run a campaign of truth that strong, smart, accomplished people don’t support Registries. Losers do. And I believe to the bottom of my heart that if someone would definitely learn/study/determine who it is that supports the Registries, it is overwhelmingly losers. It should be immoral, stupid, and not PC to support Registries. Get enough of the right people to say that and the sheep will follow. Most sheep don’t even know they are sheep.