The Number of Men in Federal Prison for Viewing or Sharing Child Pornography Has Nearly Septupled Since 2004

The number of child pornography offenders in federal prison has nearly septupled since 2004, and most are serving mandatory sentences of five years or more, generally for crimes that did not involve assault or sexual abuse. In fiscal year 2016, for example, 1,565 people were sentenced for possessing, receiving, or distributing child pornography, but only 80 (5 percent) were also convicted of production or another form of sexual abuse. The average sentence was more than eight years.

Download the report: JacobSullum_Number-imprisoned-septupled

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

19 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Duh.

I can’t help but wonder how many of those were caught because the government illegally distributed child pornography by operating child porn websites.

No matter how you cut it, years in prison for a picture. There’s tons of pictures with ISIL cutting off people’s heads online, yet I dont see them charging people with murder for viewing them…………

Obviously the harsher sentences are having a positive effect on the offense rate……….NOT!
But when a judge imposes a “softer” sentence, they suffer the rath of an uniformed public.
Judges (and evedently the Mi. A.G.) are recognizing the absurdity of the registry and sentencing guidelines for these offenses.

“That’s right: If one person hands another a drawing of children engaged in sexual activity, both can get five to 20 years.”

How can any human being with a decent IQ in their heads go and ‘defend’ their country when the lawmakers here have passed some of the most sick, evil, insane and unjust laws to have ever been put into existence ?

I find it beyond any logical reason why anyone would be proud of the US for having some of the dumbest laws on planet earth like this. The lawmakers have generally destroyed this country by destroying basic civil liberties. I don’t see those idiots claiming that looking at images of beheadings or other absolutely abhorrent violent acts that people find online should be Outlawed. Idiots. 99.9% of people that pass these laws have no damn clue what they’re even talking about, as if a picture of someone masturbating or having sex while under the age of 18 is somehow ‘violent’ by nature and absolutely creates a ‘market’ for abuse. That is the slickest, most fraudulent logic I’ve heard that keeps prisons full in this country, and real vulnerable children unsafe.

Joe1,2,3 ~ I have to agree with a lot of the things you are saying, and people should look at all this more logically. I don’t know anyone who has ever looked at CP nor have I ever watched it. I do, however, know people who watch movies where people are being murdered, tortured, raped, etc. I also know teenagers who play video games where they assassinate, kill, bomb, etc. Do I think they will act up on this in real life and kill, assassinate, bomb real people, or even fantasize about it? Maybe some will, but the majority won’t. If they did, we would be in a world of trouble. Merely watching things does not mean we will act up on it. End of story.

700% increase in 15 years!! That’s insane!!