IN: Jackson County to begin charging sex offenders for registry

[wdrb.com – 4/22/19]

For years, the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office has been behind the times when it comes to its sex offender registry.

But it will now move ahead and collect some extra money in the process.

Indiana law allows for sheriff’s offices to collect a fee from convicted sex offenders in order to maintain the sex offender registry. But, for years, Jackson County did collect any fee.

Beginning in June, the JCSO will begin collecting $50 a year from sex offenders for the registry and $5 every time an offender changes an address.

“Right now, we have 75 active sex offenders in Jackson County,” Lt. Adam Nicholson said. “About 75-80 percent where we would consider them sexually violent predators.”

Nicholson said he didn’t realize it was even a possibility until he began reviewing Indiana law regarding sex offender registries and called surrounding counties about implementing a fee.

“Most of our surrounding counties are charging the maximum $50,” he said. “There’s a lot of upkeep that goes into making sure we’re aware of what these guys are up to, where they’re living.”

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Right now, we have 75 active sex offenders in Jackson County,” Lt. Adam Nicholson said. “About 75-80 percent where we would consider them sexually violent predators.”

So 75 to 80% of his registrants are SVPs? Wow. That sort of flys in the face of all known legitimate statistics. Looks like a money grab to me. Newspapers shouldn’t print this sort of quote without mentioning the facts, or at the least that it is his opinion.

Just one more road block to being able to successfully integrate. It is so difficult to get back on your feet financially after incarceration, so this is one way to be sure it is a little more difficult. After I got out after 5 years for a non-contact offense which I lost my job, my vehicle, most all my possessions, my career, and an attorney took most of my savings, I was slapped with a $5,000 fine on top of my incarceration. Had I not had family to help me I would certainly be on the streets or probably back incarcerated for some petty technical violation like sleeping under an bridge too close to a daycare. If I had had an additional fee like this I think I would have given up. Maybe that is the idea!

“behind the times.” LMAO.. News flash: Megan’s Law IS behind the times! It’s a product of ’90s hysteria and fear mongering. We’re still scapegoated 25 years later.

Just give me one of those indigent forms to fill out, Mr. Pig.

This county uses icrimewatch.net for its public registry, and I’m certain that there are more than sufficient federal and state grants given to the SD to cover those costs. Probably more than plenty left over to cover the 20 hours per week of this clown’s precious time, as though he wouldn’t get paid otherwise.

It’s a shakedown. Period.

“BROWNSTOWN, Ind. (WDRB) — For years, the Jackson County Sheriff’s Office has been behind the times when it comes to its sex offender registry.
But it will now move ahead and collect some extra money in the process.”

Forgive me if I am wrong but to me this seems to be a form of a fine. A fine is punishment, it would seem that now the states that charge for registration are adding more punishment to the crime. The government claims that the registry is not punishment but it is civil.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fine

Merriam-Webster

fine noun (1)
a : a sum imposed as punishment for an offense
b : a forfeiture or penalty paid to an injured party in a civil action

*****************

https://thelawdictionary.org/fine/

The Law Dictionary
Featuring Black’s Law Dictionary Free Online Legal Dictionary 2nd Ed.
FINE
v. To impose a pecuniary punishment or mulct. To sentence a person convictedof an offense to pay a penalty in money. Goodman v. Durant B. & L. Ass’n, 71Miss. 310. 14 South. 146; State v. Belle, 92 Iowa, 258, 00 N. W. 525.

First, 75 “active” sex offenders. Really. Talk about spin. Active as in these guys are roaming your neighborhood right now looking for children.

Second, 75 x $50 is $3750. Really. Less than $4000 is going to make or break your department. This is nothing more than punishment and shaming. I truly feel sorry for any registrant who has to live in that community

I would NOT pay. I guess I would be arrested. They would try to ruin my credit? LOL hahaha

“Right now, we have 75 active sex offenders in Jackson County,” Lt. Adam Nicholson said. “About 75-80 percent where we would consider them sexually violent predators.”
“There’s a lot of upkeep that goes into making sure we’re aware of what these guys are up to, where they’re living.”
Pure B#llsh#t!
#1: If LEOs know of 75 existing, ongoing sex offenses (after all, wouldn’t “active sex offenders” be “actively” committing sex offenses), shouldn’t the LEOs do something about it??
#2: 80% of the 75 people on the Podunk County registry (i.e., 60 registrants) are “sexually violent predators”?? Wow, way to justify you job, Bozo! Seriously, only 15 Registrants in County Podunk are NOT “sexually violent predators” – all the others are extremely high risk??
(I guess they entirely fail to teach critical thinking in Indiana so lawmakers just accept whatever a guy in uniform serves up to them! Sad.)