IN: Prison Sex Offender Treatment vs. The Fifth

Remember the Inquisition where you could either deny your guilt and get burned at the stake, or confess and get burned at the stake? The idea was that since confessing saves you from eternal damnation, the Inquisition was simply a strict and intensive rehabilitation program, enforcing “acceptance of responsibility” for the offender’s own good. Full Article

Related

IN: 7th Circuit rules DOC sex offender program violates Constitution

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Can anyone link to another non-prison or probation program where polygraphs are used as part of treatment?

During the time I was in the SOTP here in Wisconsin we had to do a thorough inventory of our past sexual history. We were given specific instructions on how to do this without putting ourselves at legal risk, but many program participants were leery of completing the inventory for obvious reasons. The basics of the instructions were to use pseudonyms for victims, not to be specific as to time and place, and not to provide enough information to trigger mandatory reporting. I felt like we were being asked to walk a tight-rope, because if we gave too little information our inventory was rejected, and if we gave too much information it might be passed on to a prosecutor.

Some chose to not complete the inventory. They were eventually removed from the program. It was a difficult decision for me, but in the end I went forward with it. There was only one door out of confinement, and it was necessary to complete SOTP before walking through that door.

I was already locked up. Treatment completion was necessary to be released. If I didn’t complete SOTP there was a good chance of being held as a predator after my sentence. The upside of completing treatment was bigger than the potential for legal risk involved in doing the inventory needed to move forward.

I was one of the lucky few that successfully completed the 3-1/2 year long SOTP, got a transfer to a minimum security lockup working on a farm, and was granted early parole. For me it worked out.

I have to precede my remarks with a big sigh. Many innocent people are convicted of sex crimes. So, in the midst of my SATP program some twenty years ago my partner was terminally ill and about to die. Being able to visit was obviously important to both of us. I was required to memorize and recite the prosecutor’s summary, none of which was true. Failure to “take ownership” of the summary would mean maximum security and no visits and civil commitment. So basically I was required to lie. I am mad about it to this day. A better arrangement would be education but no coercion. To this very day I have flashbacks about the abusive facilitator.

See above