Review: Staging a True Family Nightmare in ‘Accidentally Brave’

[nytimes.com – 3/25/19]

Some plays are seeds and some are stones.

Seeds are the ones that grow and change over the course of their stage time — and maybe, in the minds of those who see them, forever.

Stones are the ones that always remain exactly what they are. They never expand but can still knock you out.

“Accidentally Brave,” which opened on Monday, is a stone. Not just for us but also for its author, Maddie Corman, giving a riveting performance, mostly as herself. The real-life situation she has endured over the past four years, and replays eight times a week at the DR2 Theater, still hangs on her heart. It may always.

Or as she puts it with ingratiating humor: “Just before we start this journey — oh my God, I hate the word ‘journey’ — O.K., before we start this ‘thing,’ I should let you know I am not O.K.”

The “thing” began, as far as Ms. Corman knew, in the summer of 2015. Driving to a television soundstage in Brooklyn at 5 a.m. to tape an episode of “a semi-terrible TV show,” she received a frantic call from her home in Dobbs Ferry, N.Y. While in the background her 11-year-old twin boys cry, her 16-year-old daughter shrieks in terror. Police are there and are “taking Dad’s computer.”

Dad was, and is, Jace Alexander, a director known for his work on “Law & Order.” As BuzzFeed reported, investigators who entered the couple’s house that day recovered files from Mr. Alexander’s devices “that showed minors engaged in sexual acts.”

What happens when your husband of 17 years, your “best person,” your “friend and confidant and true-blue love” — not to mention your children’s father, who sings songs at the piano and listens to NPR — turns out to be a compulsive consumer of child pornography?

“Accidentally Brave” recounts Ms. Corman’s shame and confusion as every prop beneath her warm, stable, suburban life gets knocked out. Nor does the emotional chaos end after Mr. Alexander completes a 45-day rehab for sex addiction and is sentenced, in 2016, to 10 years’ probation. Though he was never accused of touching any child inappropriately, he must also register as a sex offender.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hmmm, how to feel about this?? While I cannot point to specific episodes, anyone familiar with “Law & Order” knows all too well that sex offender/child molester/pedophile is a constant and ready “go to” perpetrator for its storylines. So much so, in fact, that the producers created a spin-off, “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit,” the voiceover lead-in to which reminds viewers that “In the criminal justice system, sexually-based offenses are considered especially heinous.”
How to feel? Well, years in prison and mistreatment by our “justice system” has left me short on sympathy, especially when considering that for many a season, Mr. Alexander enjoyed lucrative compensation for his “Law & Order” work. How many of us had the financial resources for a defense team whose efforts would result in a 45-day rehab stint and 10 years of probation, going home to his loving – albeit traumatized – family in a scant six weeks?? No, he profited a’plenty using us as his trope. And now Ms. Corman molds the dross of suffering into yet more gold.
No, indeed, no sympathy here. Knock on some other door.

I have mixed feelings. I think it is excellent that the story is getting exposed, and the violent, traumatic way the justice department raids a home is being brought to light, and the lasting damage it does to the family and even the neighbors and all involved. However, reading the comments after the article, I see it has pretty poor reviews and mostly negative comments, so I think she has failed in many ways. The biggest thing that should be brought out is the explosion of CP with the internet. We know the internet is addicting in many areas. The people that game 12 hours a day, shop chronically, get in accidents while looking at social media, want to Shoot up Youtube for demonetizing, people watching conspiracy videos, 9/11 footage, car accidents and such for hours, all these people will look a the person who views CP as depraved and sick. But I had a preconceived idea of CP, too, but when I came upon it I couldn’t believe what I saw. The sophistication of the internet allows it to be very professionally done, the shock lured me in. I was a teacher, I cared for kids, I devoted my life to them, I never did anything inappropriate (And a half dozen polygraphs verified that). But the internet is mesmerizing. I think she should have emphasized that. She stayed with her husband because he was a good man in every other area of his life.
Also, that he got no jail time makes me wonder about the severity. The article says he was a compulsive user. The only people I know that got light sentences were people with only a small number of images. I think this woman could have done a great service by better exposing the problem of CP on the internet, and how the power of the internet is in large part to blame. How many of us were going to go to bed and ended up sucked into something on the internet until one in the morning, maybe not CP, but it is that similar captivating power of the internet. I would like to see more of this at the public level so the public can become more aware of the truth of it. There are many factors that lead up to a CP offense, and that CP offenses have increased exponentially with the internet can’t be understated, something else is going on. How is it that so many people who are outstanding member of society suddenly becoming sick and depraved with no explanation.

High profile stories like this reinforce the notion that everyone with a CP conviction are perverts, predators and pedophiles. Not everyone convicted with this garbage is sexually attracted to children. The really sad part is nobody will ever believe you’re telling the truth. Society really assumes a hell of a lot just from guilt by association without case-by-case context.

Just reading the comments from that article confirms everything I care to know about society.

This not a good message on the behalf of RC’s causes. The public see us as trash and this simplify their desire to fine more trash cans.

No jail child pornography? Wtf? crazy. lucky bastard.