NY: Social media accounts raise complexities for sex offender registry

The law that went on the books 24 years ago has had updates and spawned a number of requirements for sex offenders.

One of them is that they must disclose to the state Division of Criminal Justice Services the “internet identifiers” that they use when they go online.

The rationale for that is simple to understand since it is so easy for people to use social media accounts to pretend they are someone they are not and attempt to initiate communications with an unsuspecting person.

But how much information must be provided to DCJS is now the subject of a review by New York’s highest court. The Court of Appeals heard arguments June 5 with regard to a registration violation charge lodged against a North Country sex offender named ___ ___. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

People who support Registries and idiocy like this are morons. It should be beyond clear to even idiots like them that their “laws” are only going to affect people who are interested in living normal lives. Other people aren’t going to concern themselves with their “laws”.

I think it is hilarious that Facecrook wants people to use their real names and yet they try to ban people who are listed on the big government hit lists. So guess what listed people do? Use fake identities. I’ve been on Facecrook forever and I will be as long as they dream it is acceptable to try to ban me. Guaranteed.

I gave my username when I registered. only use facebook and twitter and my Facebook account got suspended 1 year after registering.

I wonder how facebook found out? I have a hard time getting facebook to delete duplicate accounts/bots/spammers etc…

Dude,
They utilized your email addresses by cross reference to the list of registered persons KNOWN email accounts. Registrants are electronically blacklisted.

This law saves children from sex abuse, right?

The Court of Appeals is expected to issue a ruling within the next month. If Ellis prevails as he did in the appellate court, then New York will be left with a hole in its safety net for those who rely on the Sexual Offender Registration Act to protect their families.

The repair of that hole would have to be done by state lawmakers.

Joe Mahoney covers the New York Statehouse for CNHI’s newspapers and websites. Reach him at jmahoney@cnhi.com.

Nice of him to include his contact information. It would seem a reasonable place to communicate our experiences and point of view.

I don’t even understand how this is an issue after packingham. The purpose of estop and the collection of this information is to pass it on to social networking sites so they can ban you. The state cannot ban people from social media and by collecting the list to pass on they are essentially doing that. Where is the ACLU …

Having a Facebook account is very close to being a necessity and something that cannot be denied. In my town there is an uprising against local government via an upstart opposition party. One must have a Facebook in order to communicate, use the forum, gather information and for all intents and purposes, “join.”
Also, my freedom of speech is quelled because without a Facebook account, I cannot respond to extremely popular and extremely important news articles.
These two examples are just the very tip of a huge iceberg and everybody knows it.

Pled guilty today to 2 counts FTR internet identifiers (Facebook) (Felony – E). First recommendation from the prosecutor was 1 year county time on count 1 and dismissing count 2. I declined that offer and got 2 new prosecutors and a new attorney since receiving that offer last year – final sentence was $2,500 fine on each count today. I am in Missouri and we have some of the most egregious laws as it applies to changing or adding information with an LEO (must appear IN PERSON prior to creating the identifier). I’ve spent $20,000 fighting this thing, anyone know of a lawyer who would assist with a civil complaint in federal court pro bono?

@AJ great info as I have those in my file currently! I encourage others to download from that link and read the opinion. Everyone has access to the courts, and even if you don’t have the $$$ you can still educate yourself and seek assistance.