NM: ____ ____ Registered as a Sex Offender in 2 States. In New Mexico, He Didn’t Have To.

____ ____, the New York financier, managed to evade federal prosecution a decade ago in a Florida sex case involving dozens of teenage girls, in part by agreeing to register as a sex offender. But for a man with many residences, and many high-powered lawyers, registering as a sex offender was not the blanket penalty it might seem. Full Article

Related

New Mexico AG Wants New Sex Offender Law Amid Epstein Probe
https://mobile.twitter.com/schwartzapfel/status/1149686629445111808

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

From the article ““He can give up his New York home if he does not want to come every 90 days,” Justice Ruth Pickholz said.” – Yes, that is just like a Price Club membership.

I have always wondered how this works, with secondary residences. For example, in California, if you spend nights regularly at a secondary residence (like your elderly mother’s house or a vacation house at Big Bear Lake), you are required to report that as a secondary residence. Are you required to register at that jurisdiction’s law enforcement agency in person – within 5 days of your birthday?

The personal reporting requirement under PC 290 already pretty much makes any substantial travel around your birthday impossible. One will never be able to celebrate one’s birthday in Paris or Hawaii with a 3 week trip, with the birthday in the middle. Or take a lengthy Christmas outing.

But does one have to get one’s butt physically into the secondary cop shop within 5 days of one’s birthday? At some point, if one owned enough second residences – so many that one humanly could not get to them all in 10 days, that would, in practical sense, make it a crime to own property for personal use or visit your family on a regular basis.

The Wheels are Coming Off. .

It has been my personal experience that, in CA, everything is negotiable; particularly when it comes to PC 290 deadlines. Most PD have only 1 person doing the work. If you are a very personable person, you can negotiate “registration appointments” with that individual.

I wonder if this man has ever visited this blog. If he was a poor man, his plea deal would stick.
Funny how sex cases overcome process standards when there is ” some other issue afoot. ”
The Judge signing off on the plea must have used the DO J approved standard operating procedure. STATE would have had an opportunity to incorporate other acts in the plea as read ins if jurisdiction was same.

This case is a disaster.