CO: Colorado considers keeping some juvenile sex offenders off registry

[thedenverchannel.com – 10/12/10]

DENVER (AP) — Colorado lawmakers have advanced a proposal to place fewer convicted juveniles on the state sex offender registry and partially seal the list from the public, officials said.

The draft was endorsed Thursday by an interim committee of lawmakers tasked with considering changes to how the state justice system treats people with mental illness, The Denver Post reported .

The proposed changes are informed by research showing that harshly penalizing juvenile sex offenders often does nothing to improve public safety or rehabilitate the offenders, lawmakers said. Currently, juvenile sex offenders could be required to stay on the registry their whole lives, limiting job and housing options, among other consequences.

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

11 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Why are we stigmatizing CHILDREN and preventing them from turning their lives around, and potentially ruining any productive and successful future they may have?” said state Sen. Robert Rodriguez, a Denver Democrat who chairs the committee. “We need to provide opportunities for change in behavior and a path to move forward.”

Replace the word “CHILDREN” with “ALL REGISTRANTS” and then we’ll have real changes!

So the registry is debilitating to juveniles, but not adults? It’s an acknowledgement that the registry is in fact punitive.

Their attempt to get ahead of the 10th circuit’s pending review of Judge Matsch’s Millard v. Rankin smack down? “Hey, we changed it a little bit so his opinion is no longer valid!”

YESl
May we please stop the indenture of human Children to the state’s electronic database machine commonly referred to as the sex offender registry. It is a form of slavery because it works anti liberty as a framework for the affirmative restraints imposed by anyone and everyone. Convincing Federal Judges has limited effect in this situation ( see Michigan) precisely because the limits imposed by rejection 06, 11,’amendments on ex post grounds impact FED USE OF THE MACHINES To CIVILLY TRACK ALL on the basis of precaution. Electronic domestic surveillance has always been a hot button among the general public, and some healthy distrust remains in this American. The two parties cannot be trusted with these powerful machines without substantive oversight on many levels. Like the fisa COURTS, the system is vulnerable to misuse. While this article discusses a discussion being had; the fact remains registrants nation wide suffer M>H= null.The current story in WI.https://www.channel3000.com/news/second-protest-held-in-support-of-three-teens-convicted-of-sexual-assault/1131624053

But these sex offenders are dangerous for 10, 20, 30 years of life!! The public demands the sex offender registry for sex crimes!! Ugh

Kids with ZERO physical or sexual contact are placed on the registry here in Colorado. The case in sexting. It is wrong.