MO: Sex Offender’s Art Sculpture Allegedly Attracts Children, Disrupts Neighborhood

An art sculpture in the front yard of a Kansas City home attracts a lot of children, which has the surrounding neighbors upset. Normally such art wouldn’t be a problem, though in this case, it’s in the yard of a registered sex offender.

The sculpture is made of hanging bikes, and a majority of the bikes look like they’re for kids. The neighbors thought it was a piece of art until they found out the creator and man who lives there is a registered sex offender in Missouri. Full Article

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

15 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The thing that all of us that have been convicted these crimes need to keep in mind at all times is avoidance of anything appeared to be evil. I was ask by my pastor “to head up the food service for a visiting youth group” I declined because I do not want to seen in among children.

First, that artwork in the front yard is protected speech underneath the First Amendment as ass been proven by other artists in this country. The neighbors can go away if they don’t like to look at it. “Mommy, I want to be an artist just like that man when I grow up.”

Second, the story just proves how efficient the registries are because if it took them this many years to figure out he was a person impacted by the registry because of artwork in his front yard that he completed, well, we must have more of them of course. At the same time, his reoffending statistics possibility must be off the charts at this time! 😆 15 years later…

Third, he’s not mandated to tell any of his neighbors, anyone in the neighborhood who he is, what he’s done in life, where he has been, or what’s happened to him.

Fourth, just because Missouri is known as the show me state, what is he supposed to show people? The money? 😆 I think his showing the art in his front yard is enough.

Take note the hyperlink to FWD, a private form Who profits from use of gov data. FWD Holdings group operates the site for free but it is not free to those by law rewired to update to theirs. Packingham v NC discussed the ubiquitous nature of these kinds of private firms who overrun state sovereignty to both data AND jurisdiction.

A neighbor of three years that has caused no problems in his community and all they focus on is his status. It’s not like he changed or did anything different that disrupted the neighborhood.

That STIGMA will override logic, compassion, and the ability to judge properly of anyone.

Oh and it was so thoughtful of these people to want the Registrant to move somewhere else and “be some other neighborhood’s problem”.

It’s moments like this that makes me wish that being an arrogant selfish prick ought to be a crime too.

But then again that would put nearly the majority of the population behind bars!

You guys forget, individuals on the registry have forfeited their humanity and are no longer considered human. Its the very reason why many rights said individuals are denied basic “human/citizen” rights in the Us.

Incredible; you have GOT to see the sculpture in this guy’s front yard !! Derek Logue found a picture and put it on his Shiitake site: Shiitakeweekly.blogspot.com