ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


How the “Stranger Danger” Panic of the 1980s Helped Give Rise to Mass Incarceration

[ – 5/18/20]

The missing-child panic began with Etan Patz. Plenty of kids had gone missing before, but Etan’s case seemed specially designed to provoke a mass hysteria. In 1979, the six-year-old boy’s mother arranged for him to walk to the school bus stop on his own. She watched him depart from her Manhattan fire escape. Another mother was waiting two blocks away in an apartment overlooking the bus stop site, but Etan never arrived.

The tragedy was and remains impossible to comprehend. His first time walking to the bus stop? Two blocks away? With adults looking out for him? It meant something. There were powerful forces capable of unfathomable violence — forces previously undetected, possibly swiftly advancing, perhaps already everywhere — from which nobody was safe.

High-quality photographs of Etan taken by his father, a professional photographer, blanketed the city and the national news media for months, which stretched into years. Fear began to mount, and eventually all were afraid. Children’s faces, including but hardly limited to Etan’s, began appearing on milk cartons. In 1982, CBS Evening News informed rapt and terrified adults that up to fifty thousand American children were being kidnapped by strangers every year.

“These figures were wildly inflated, as journalists, social scientists, and government officials had made clear by the mid-1980s,” writes Paul Renfro in his new book Stranger Danger: Family Values, Childhood, and the American Carceral State. But it didn’t matter. Panic had clenched the nation’s psyche, and its grip was tightening.

Renfro situates the response to Etan Patz’s disappearance in the context of 1970s New York. As “deindustrialization battered New York City with an enduring intensity” and “some two million white New Yorkers bolted for the suburbs,” the city was left in crisis. The social chaos that resulted — which was exaggerated, as Renfro points out, but did include rising crime — demanded a response of some kind. That response could have been an expanded welfare state. Instead, it was austerity and a bulked-up policing and carceral apparatus.

It’s no coincidence that the nation’s missing child or “stranger danger” panic originated in a city that much of the nation had already come to regard as the epicenter of dangerous strangers — and a city that had already begun to lay the groundwork to respond with more police and prisons. The link between mass incarceration and violence against children was there from the beginning of the stranger danger panic, foreshadowing what would transpire in the decades to come.

Read the full article


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

And predictably the “milk carton” gave way to Amber alerts and the witch hunting of everyone with a sex crime.

The huge take-away is, America has become a nation of reactionary cowards that want to protect children at all costs, but there is always a cost. It gave rise to the terms “helicopter parenting,” “creeper” and “pedophile.” So we’ve morphed into a culture that is paranoid and suspicious of not only strangers, but even close friends and family members without allegations. That fear and paranoia is handed down and nurtured just like racism is.

Living in today’s hyper-vigilant and easily-offended society is an assault on common sense and sanity.

Most people probably know this but you can turn off AMBER alerts on your electronic devices. I always do. Research has shown that AMBER alerts aren’t effective so there’s no need to worry about them. Further, the “people” who started AMBER alerts are enemies of all real Americans. The mother of the AMBER namesake said right away after her abduction that America needed “tougher laws governing kidnappers and sex offenders”. She and the father started “People Against Sex Offenders (P.A.S.O.)”. AMBER alert supporters only want help and support from some Americans, not from people they are “Against”. I’d assume not People Forced to Register. So I personally make it a point to never pay any attention to any missing person information, no matter how it is delivered.

Only bad parents “need” Registries. I never did because I protect my children from all people, regardless of if some big government decided to list the person on a hit list or not. I would certainly never trust big government to try to guess if one of my neighbors is a child molester or not. I’ll go ahead and assume that anyone could be.

To a CSI-programmed public the panic is believable. Eventually the names don’t matter so much as the “movement”. A movement emboldened by the propaganda they feed to each other and to themselves.

Who doesn’t want to “save the children”?

Who doesn’t want to “support victims”?

Now if they were REALLY honest they’d ask who doesn’t want to “undermine and demolish our constitution”. Nobody cared before that that’s what they were being led down to the slaughthouse for.

Until it happened to YOU.

It’s not so much a “movement” as it is the entitled OUTRAGE CULTURE of the last 20 years and the subsequent BRIGADING that happens as a side effect. The kitchen sink approach to “safeguarding children” is what got us here and I’m tired of people demanding that we “kid proof” everything. Everyone is paying the price for protecting children at all costs. Everyone! You can’t even visit a park, toy store or a library anymore without an icy glare or a nosy Karen calling the police claiming there’s a “suspicious man that is casing the area for children.”

It’s worth noting that, when Etan Patz’s killer was finally revealed decades later, he was not a “pedophile” but a bodega clerk with psychosis who worked down the street from the Patz apartment. So, all of those years that the message was being hammered-home to hate and fear “pedophiles” the truth was something very different. None of that misapprehension of risk, however, has been corrected. It’s still “the pedophile” who is seen as the greatest risk to children even while parents continue to murder their own children in numbers hundreds of times greater than any strangers. Ask anyone about “child abuse” today and they will reliably assume that you mean sexual abuse and not physical or emotional abuse or neglect. The children’s rights movement got hijacked by obsessives and cranks decades ago for the purpose of stoking paranoia, limiting the freedom of kids and providing cover to actual – not mythical – abusers.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x