CO: Sex abuse bill SB 73 easily clears House committee following lengthy negotiations

[coloradopolitics.com – 3/23/21]

A bill to give future survivors of childhood sexual abuse and other types of misconduct unlimited time to take their perpetrators to court passed out of the House Judiciary Committee by a vote of 10-1 on Tuesday night, but only after a prolonged off-microphone conference to narrow the scope of the measure.

As written, Senate Bill 73, which passed the Senate unanimously earlier this month, would take child sex abuse and a range of other sexual offenses against both adults and children and remove the civil statute of limitations for all. Under current law, a child who is sexually abused generally has six years after they turn 18 to sue their abuser and two years to sue a third party, such as an employer, a church or a youth organization.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Well, civil is bad but criminal is much worse. Let’s hope the day that criminal statues for this kind of thing are removed entirely never comes. Remember in California they 40 years to file criminal charges.

Will that include new lawsuits on Squints from the movie “Sandlot” or Seth from “Super bad”?

The real culprit is the system itself for 1) putting sex ed in schools and 2) putting “mature content” on tvs, in movies and music, and in print. Bluring the lines. Then when a kid gets some bright idea connecting the two he’ll get shamed by the “responsible adults”. And so will the “irresponsible parents” of this now “at risk” kid. But there’s nothing wrong with the kid, and they know it. They merely watched as their tripwire plans led to the creation of a new “sex offender pervert”. They MAKE harmless people into sex offenders. They MAKE harmless incidents into sex offenses. That’s the only way to keep the cases piling up.

If you committed a crime against a child i agree that there should be no statute of limitations on those type of crimes.
I was so young when i took my plea deal that i never even heard of the word sex offender before i heard of words like rapists and child molesters but sex offenders was new to me shortly after that everyone started using the word pedophiles when referring to people on Megan’s law .

Good luck

Here are two alternate sources on this topic (because the source website above requires a paid subscription after about 5 seconds of trying to read it):

After infighting, Colorado lawmakers revive effort to give child sex assault survivors unlimited time to sue abusers (https://coloradosun.com/2021/02/25/colorado-child-sexual-assault-civil-statute-limitations-2021/)

Sex abuse bill easily clears House committee following lengthy negotiations (https://gazette.com/colorado_politics/sex-abuse-bill-easily-clears-house-committee-following-lengthy-negotiations/article_5aaa0cb4-a884-5f55-8327-d388ba01fd86.html)