ACLU Attorney Miriam Aukerman to Speak at ACSOL Conference on September 17

ACLU attorney Miriam Aukerman will discuss her many successes challenging sex offender laws in Michigan at the ACSOL conference on Friday, September 17, at 12:30 p.m. (Pacific).  After her presentation, attorney Aukerman will be available for questions from conference attendees.

Sign up today!

“Attorney Aukerman has done what many other attorneys have been unable to do,” stated ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  “That is, she has persuaded courts that the requirement to register is punishment and therefore new sex offender laws cannot be applied retroactively.”

Litigation in one case, Does v. Snyder, began about 10 years ago when several registrants challenged new sex offender laws in Michigan that were applied to them retroactively,  The new laws including a prohibition that registrants could not live, work or loiter within 1,000 feet of a school and divided registrants into three tiers based upon the crime of conviction, not current dangerousness.

In a strongly worded decision, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Michigan’s sex offender laws impose punishment and therefore new registration laws could not be applied retroactively.  Statements in the decision include “SORA brands registrants as moral lepers solely on the basis of a prior conviction” and “SORA’s requirements also resemble traditional shaming punishments.”  The Court also noted that, due to the new registration laws, registrants “have had trouble finding a home in which they can legally live or a job where they can legally work.”  Further, the Court noted that the school zone restrictions have prevented registrants from watching their children or grandchildren “participate in school plays or on school sports teams” as well as “visiting public playgrounds.”

The defendants in the case, including the Governor, did not like the court’s ruling and therefore requested review of that decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.  However, the U.S. Supreme Court denied that review.

“Michigan has been a battleground for registrants’ rights for a decade,” stated Bellucci.  “After this case was decided, the legislature made feeble attempts to revise the state’s sex offender laws.  Attorney Aukerman will explain during the conference the current state of Michigan’s sex offender laws.”

Although she was not an attorney in the recent case, People v. Betts, Aukerman will explain its significance to registrants currently residing in Michigan.  In that case, the Michigan State Supreme Court ruled that some sex offender laws constitute punishment and therefore cannot be applied retroactively.  Similar to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decision, this court acknowledged the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Smith v. Doe, which ruled that sex offender laws in Alaska did not constitute punishment and then explained that sex offender laws in Michigan were harsher for several reasons including the fact that registrants must register in person.

People v. Betts – Ex Post Facto – July 2021

Does v. Snyder – 6th Circuit – Aug 2016

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

We are very lucky to have Miriam join the ACSOL conference this year! She is a true hero and has lots of information to share with the registrant community both inside and outside the state of Michigan.

Agree with Bobby , Not a lot has come out of the Michigan rulings for those of us who were retroactively punished for the last 28 years. We have heard a whole lot of patting on the backs is about it. Nothing has changed for the ones who have been living this hell these politicians have loaded on our backs with no reason or rhymes. Just wish they would fight for getting people removed who the courts have said were punished after a conviction. Punitive means , they violated our constitutional rights.
Free Us Already !

Miriam litigates on a broad range of civil liberties issues, with a particular focus on immigrant rights, poverty, and criminal justice. In Hamama v. Adducci, she headed a team that sued Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), after ICE arrested hundreds of Iraqi nationals, who faced deportation to Iraq, where they were likely to be tortured or killed because of their religion or ethnicity. A federal judge not only stopped the mass deportations, but ordered ICE to release hundreds of Iraqis from detention. In Does v. Snyder, Miriam won a precedent-setting Court of Appeals’ decision which found Michigan’s sex offender registry unconstitutionally punitive. Other cases include Barry v. Lyon, which resulted in the return of $52 million in wrongfully withheld food assistance to low-income families; Speet v. Schuette, which struck down Michigan’s anti-begging law; One Michigan v. Johnson, which led the Michigan to issue driver’s licenses to immigrant youth who have lawful status under the DACA program (“Dreamers”); and Arab American Civil Rights League v. Trump, which challenges President Trump’s Muslim Ban. Miriam also promotes constitutional rights through media appearances, public education, legislative advocacy and training.

I got a letter in the mail one day from a guy who was a registered sex offender at first I thought it was a letter from one of those law offices trying profit off my desperation and misery but as I kept reading it I realized it was from an actual registrant, the letter was straight forward it was calling for all sex offenders in California to stop hiding in the shadows and stand up fight and let your voices be heard.
At the time I never talked to another person on the registry before and it sounded like he was part of some kind of organization of people forced to register.
So I called the number on the letter he said he was a REGISTERED CITIZEN from Lake Forest and was charged with CP and he was trying to from an organization of registrants he also said he stood with Janice Bellucci and spoke out against the registry to politicians in Sacramento.
At the time I never heard the words REGISTERED CITIZENS when referring to sex offenders and I never heard the acronym CP and I never herd of Janice Bellucci
Right before I hung up he said you ever heard of a website called ACSOL they have alot of information on there about REGISTERED CITIZENS you should check it out.

Good luck

Last edited 1 year ago by AERO1

We seem to win minor victories, any of which can be reversed. We really need a major victory, one which will give us all hope. Removal from the registry in Michigan tier 1 or pre 2011 conviction is needed. Something like this victory would give us all true inspiration to get involved on a national level to effect change. Let’s advise our Michigan governor that she is under scrutiny. We can remove her from office. I will stand in Lansing if it will help. I will be removed from the registry shortly however I will not abandoned the cause.

Maybe she will talk too the people in Michigan before she heads to Cali , A lot of us would like too hear what is going on in Our state .