ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (11/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

 

ACSOL NewsCalifornia

Los Angeles Courts Grant Two Petitions

Source: ACSOL

Two superior courts in Los Angeles county have granted petitions submitted on behalf of two different registrants.  The first petition was granted on Nov. 5 in the San Fernando Valley court house to a registrant convicted of Penal Code section 243.4 whose tier had not yet been determined.  This registrant was represented by ACSOL President Chance Oberstein.

The second petition was granted today in the downtown Los Angeles courthouse to a registrant convicted of Penal Code section 288(a) and assigned to Tier 2.  This registrant was represented by ACSOL Executive Director Janice Bellucci.  In both cases, the District Attorney did not object to the petitions.

In addition to the petitions granted in Los Angeles county, it is reported that 22 petitions have been granted thus far in San Diego county.  That total includes petitions submitted by the public defenders office on behalf of registrants convicted of Penal Code section 288(a).  

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
33 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Nice. Congratulations to all!

Congratulations! Thank you team ACSOL!

Congrats to ALL!

The momentum is building!

Once tens of thousands of registrants are released from the tyranny of the registry and the public sees that there is NOT a huge wave of sex crimes, then there will be hope to change the registry to start allowing us level 3’s off.

That sounds nice, but it will not work. People want and need to have boogie men. If they lose a few thousand it won’t affect the rest because the released will quickly work to become anonymous again and society will forget that they were ever released. Then society will keep on believing that only the listed citizens are dangerous.

I agree. Not only that but the lying Registry Supporters will continue to feed the clueless public their lies and the public will believe that somehow our dumbass governments have actually figured out who the “worst of the worst” are and that they are now “monitoring” those fewer people extra well.

Personally, I think if they do somehow identify the “worst of the worst” then they will be making those dangerous, unstable people even worse. The Oppression Lists really do seem idiotic to me. I guess since probation/parole wasn’t working so well they thought they’d also try make-believe, magic Lists?

It is a lot harder to oppress 1,000,000 families than it is 100,000. Once the criminal regimes get it down to just the right number, all of us can jump on with everyone else and oppress away. It’ll be easier.

I agree as time goes on tier 3 will be more oppressed and screwed as they can focus more on them. Sadly the CP cases really got the brunt of all his mess and

when they restructured the original bill.

What was the basis for the appeal for the 288(a) as that was an attempt (664) and working with LA Public Defender and would like to make a move from Tier 2 to Tier 1 and with a COR I would be able to now get off the Registry

Just out of curiosity, are Chance and Janice donating their time for these petitions????

No, Chance and I are not donating our time for these petitions. We are working on behalf of paying clients.

As you should. I assume you two need to eat, etc.

Just like to express my appreciation for this organization. Thank you Janice for all your work and dedication and to you Chance, thank you for the fight u put up in getting my petition granted. After 27 years on this registry I simply had enough. Hiring u as my private attorney was the best thing ever. Congrats to the other individual who’s petition was granted as well. I must say I was on edge going in on this with a TBD status. Again many thanks 🙏

Congratulations to you Benny. And Yes, Attorneys Chance and Janice are excellent. I retained Attorney Chance for Dismissal with great result with my Petition for dismissal granted also. Attorney Chance Oberstein explain the law in this area where the Judge even pull out the big Penal Code book to verify. In addition, in my opinion, made the DA’s office looked unprepared and either would not or could not comprehend the complete Law. Thank you Attorney Chance for your hard and excellent work

i would like use janice also in may of 2022, 288a conviction 1989,,,..

ACSOL’s contact info (it’s at the top of this page.

Man this is crazy, these usually hands on 288(a)s (which includes children of all ages under 14) are getting off the registry when the 664/288(a) with the added 288.2 simply for talking to them online about meeting in person are not.
Unbelievable.

Why is that? Don’t be like the political monsters and try to label one crime worse than the other. We are all better than that. Did you know that my spouse is a 288 a for being a high school senior with a freshmen relationship that was not sexual besides kissing. The victim turned 14 one week later. You cannot label a 664 less just as I won’t say a 664 is worse. Each case is different. Each victim is different. We need to show support and yes, I agree those labeled with certain offenses that are tier 3 are bogus as heck, but I refuse to label other registrants as worse than the other when I don’t have facts.

Not saying anyone is worse or better than anyone else, simply stating the severity of the crimes by statute. Common sense tells me in my opinion that a actual 288(a) with a six year old is way more severe than a attempted 288(a) with a 13 year old over the internet. Must be my twisted way of thinking because obviously the state doesn’t think so.
And yes every case is different but severity differences.

Last edited 11 days ago by mike r

Because the misdemeanor version of 288.2 is Tier 1. You can commit the same crime and either be on the registry 10 years or life depending how it was prosecuted.

Thanks for all you do I’m hopeful one day Virginia will have some positive news. I’m so happy for everyone who is free.

its sad though that people in CA that have a pc311 are LIFERS ;(

Only for now, Jeff, only for now.
I can assure you that ACSOL and its many followers will continue to fight to fix the faults in the current California Tiered Registry system.
I attend & participate in the ACSOL lobbying efforts in Sacramento and I hope many others will join me. 👍🏻

That is not true. Some people convicted of PC 311 have been assigned to Tier 1

@janice,

Do know if that’s the case with felony variant? My understanding was only the misdomeanor variant.

Congratulations to these two that Petition for removal and was granted. Great work and time from Attorneys Chance Oberstein and Janice Bellucci. Excellent Attorneys who get great results. Also, I would like to hear if any Petitions for removal have been granted from San Bernardino County and if they were TBD. Anyone have difficulty with this County?

I petitioned July 31st for relief of registration, it’s been over 4 months now, im wondering is this normal? is there a way to check on my status? the courts sent me to the counties public defenders office in which I handed my relief forms? even if I had to pay an attorney *I would * atleast I would know something & with updates, and all honesty, it would be worth every single cent *GOOD LUCK TO ALL*

When I submit a petition, I tell my client to expect an answer in 6 months or longer. Why? Because local law enforcement has 60 days (2 months) to determine whether you are eligible to petition. Then the DA’s office has another 60 days (2 months to respond to your petition — no objection, request summary denial or request court hearing). The court does not have a deadline to act.

thank you so much for the info *really appreciate 🙏 * to bad the court systems didn’t work this fast with answers and or results *GOOD LUCK TO ALL* thank you Janice & chase for fighting & continuing to educate us*

hello janice i will use you for my process for removal on my b day 2022 may riv county conviction 288a , 1989 ,,tier 2 now send info so we can start process of hiring you thanx

I just donated $100.00

Thank you, J, for your generous donation!

Im in San Diego and was assigned to Tier 3. My charges are 288(a) and 288.2(b). My attorney had determined I should be in Tier 2 and qualify for 10 year exception.

I don’t know why I’m in Tier 3. It seems the DOJ can just place anyone in any tier regardless of charges?

I see 288.2 is in Tier 3 but why would 288(a) be in Tier 2 when it’s a worse offense? These laws make no sense.

Well you know, talking to someone on the internet is worse than actually laying hands on a 6 year old.

33
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.