ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (07/23 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

ACSOL Conference Oct 1, 2022 

 

National

TX: Austin sees hundreds of sex offender cases removed from police officer supervision due to defunding

Source: foxnews.con 1/8/22

A source tells Fox News that one of the sex offenders moved to civilian supervision sexually assaulted an autistic teenager

Hundreds of convicted sex offenders are no longer being monitored by sworn police officers in Austin, Texas due to the city’s move to defund the police and cut police academy classes. 

As of 2019, there were about 1,600 registered sex offenders in Austin according to the state’s sex offender database. There is no law preventing any of them from living near schools or other places where children tend to congregate, according to a local news report. About 650 of those cases were handled by officers who checked in on the registered sex offenders weekly to ensure they were where they reported themselves to be. But three of those officers were sent back to patrol as a result of the decision to defund the police, including slashing three cadet classes at the police academy, in August 2020. Defunding the police forced the department to cut the Sex Offender Apprehension and Registration Unit (SOAR).

Those cases once handled by sworn police officers are now being monitored by civilian employees, including two who only work part-time. The civilian monitors lack arrest authority and some question whether they are able to keep up with the increased caseload.

Read the full article

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This says it all:

“In order to prioritize the Department’s ability to respond to 911 phone calls and keep the community safe, APD has had to reallocate some personnel from our support units back to patrol. The Sex Offender Apprehension and Registration Unit (SOAR) is one of the units affected by these staffing challenges and lost 3 officers who were re-assigned to patrol in the process…”

You have to read between the lines, but this cop basically says that “real police work” is what keeps the community safe and not this S.O.A.R. bullcrap!!!
I love it!

Sure pull at people’s heart strings to get more money! If that don’t work scare the hell out of them. Just in) Sex offenders falling from the sky’s lock your children up. And bolt your doors. Even your pet is in danger. Put fido in the basement and god forbid the goldfish is not dressed. Sex offenders will attack anything. Save your hole’s for you might have a dick attack you. Hmmm or is it the cops who scare you out of money. With sex offenders all over the place. To me yes defund the lier. Money talks. Problem is cops will lie for it.

I’d really like to hear someone explain what role the registry played in the investigation of the alleged rape of the autistic teenager. After that, an explanation of how a “compliance check” (read: random search for an innocuous violation) would have prevented it.

I have a form of autism and I feel like I’m getting screwed by the government. Maybe I should stop showering and they’ll leave me alone.

This presents an ideal opportunity for the public to learn whether Registries have any actual effect on public safety.
Be patient. The proof awaits!

(I anticipate the same number of offenses with, as usual, the great majority of them being committed by NON-Registrants.)

Civilian supervision?? EEEEK! I’ll bet the Byrne Grant folks didn’t see that coming. Since when are police officers responsible for supervising DOC\DPS clients in TX? I’m in WI, and when local police assist SOR agents in arrest for failure to register, I ask to local cop ” Do we arrest folks for absconding if there is no paperwork in the record saying the person was actually on parole or probation in the first place? ” Fact is SCOTUS itself identified this impropriety in Kentucky v Padilla. The propper paperwork is necessary to proceed in civil matters. However, that hurdle can be waived so long as its waived knowingly – see standard waiver of civil rights.

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.