ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (07/23 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

ACSOL Conference Oct 1, 2022 

 

ACSOL NewsCalifornia

New CA Tiered Registry Lawsuit Filed in L.A. Superior Court

Source: ACSOL

A lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on June 16 challenging a provision of the California Tiered Registry Law.   Specifically, a registrant is challenging his assignment to Tier 3 based upon his conviction for violating Penal Code Section 288(c)(1).  According to the lawsuit, the registrant’s tier assignment violates the equal protection clause of the state constitution.  The lawsuit requests that the court prohibit the California Department of Justice from assigning individuals convicted of Section 288(c)(1) to Tier 3.

After his original conviction of a felony violation of Section 288(c)(1), the plaintiff obtained a reduction of that offense to a misdemeanor.  In addition, the plaintiff later obtained a certificate of rehabilitation.

The lawsuit notes that individuals convicted of more severe offenses than Section 288(c)(1) have been assigned to a lower tier, that is, to either Tier 1 or Tier 2.  For example, individuals convicted of violating Section 288(a) are assigned to Tier 2 after being found guilty of committing the same acts but with a victim of a different age.  Specifically, the victim of those convicted of Section 288(a) is under 14 while the victim of those convicted of Section 288(c) is older — 14 or 15.  

A similar lawsuit was filed in February 2021 in Sacramento Superior Court.  The judge in that case granted the government’s demurrer and therefore the merits of the case were not decided.  A notice of appeal has been filed in the Sacramento case and the opening brief of the appeal is due next month.

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of

25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I am confused. If he received a COR, why is he registering at all? A COR was the only way (besides a Pardon) to get relief. When did he receive the COR? Before SB384?

Is there a record of the demure motion filed from 2021 available? It’d be nice to see it in context. Best of luck with the new filing.

I will be happy to see these lawsuits move forward so the statute’s stupidity can be corrected.👍🏻

Congratulations Janice and ACSOL. Everyone of these people that get off the registry is because of your work. I know the tiered registry is a work in progress, and I am hoping that those of us with a simple CP offense will be able to get some relief in the future, and not to be condemned for life on it.

im in the same boat with this guy except for the COR. Can I join this lawsuit or wait it out

In a previous equal protection case, about 12 years ago, the remedy was NOT to grant relief to the person complaining of unfair treatment (and the others who fit the “unfair” situation) but to impose similar conditions on all the others with the “other” offense. An unintended consequence, but a troubling precedent. What happens to those who are tier 2 now 288(a), but under the potential change could become be reclassified as tier 3?

I wouldn’t hold my breath. It’s all about control, and they’re not going to give it up.
They don’t care about the Constitution, in fact they hate it and us. Control will have to be wrested from their claws.

This is absurd! He should be off the registry now!

Why isn’t there any movement going on in Texas with this registration shit? Ms Janice Bellucci can you inquire anything from any lawyers or ACLU in Texas. I’ve emailed probably 15 to 20 or the last 8 months and not one has replied.

25
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.