NM: Bill could change punishment for New Mexico probation violations

Source: krqe.com 1/6/24

NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – The New Mexico legislative session is starting soon, and several bills have been filed this week. One bill, backed by Senators Antonio Maestas and Bill O’Neil, aims to change the way probation violations are handled.

“Right now, under state law, you have two choices: Slap them on the wrist or remand them in custody, waiting for a judge to deem out final sentencing,” said Maestas.

Senator Maestas said other technical violations could have an explanation that was out of the parolees’ control, like missing scheduled appointments.

The bill suggests four recourses for a technical violation. A first offense would be punishable by up to three days of community service, a second moves it up to five days.

Senator Maestas added that numerous other states have implemented similar laws, including Louisiana, which update its probation laws last year.

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I thought this clip was funny. So a bill in New Mexico would help drug addicts he makes a reference that everybody misses appointments. However, if we miss an appointment straight to prison, we go also interesting that they say punishment and a list sex offender and violent registries as being on them as punishment just more evidence of the politicians admitting the registry punishment.

Standard, includes contacting a victim or witness, absconding, or deliberately missing a supervised appointment, committing a new crime, or being a sex or violent offender.”

So being a “sex or violent offender” is a standard violation? Does it not follow that a person convicted of a sex crime or crime of violence cannot be placed on probation, because that person’s status is a violation? A bit of a journalistic slip, it would seem. Nothing in the bill or New Mexico statutes says simply “being a sex or violent offender” is a parole or probation violation.

I can’t help but wonder what other facts that KRQE has managed to mangle, deliberately or otherwise.